XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2023-09-30 13:46, badgolferman wrote:   
   > Alan  wrote:   
   >> On 2023-09-30 13:07, badgolferman wrote:   
   >>> Wally J  wrote:   
   >>>> badgolferman  wrote   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> The vague description of the problem will lead to a vague description of   
   >>>>> the solution.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> iOS 17 has been installed on my work iPhone 11 and I havenąt noticed any   
   >>>>> problems, but then I only use Outlook to view email.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> iOS 16.7 has been installed on my personal iPhone 14 and I will hold out   
   >>>>> for the vague solution to be released.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hi badgolferman,   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If we use our adult cognitive skills and our well-remembered history of   
   >>>> what Apple does to cleverly hide their (repeated) lack of testing...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> *A pattern emerges*   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Do you see the pattern?   
   >>>> I do.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What's patently obvious to any adult is Apple forgot to test this latest   
   >>>> device in the real world (which includes Instagram & iOS 17 for example).   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Right?   
   >>>> That's a fact as had they tested it, this never would have happened.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So we have to agree - as adults - Apple didn't sufficiently test it.   
   >>>> That pattern has already been well established with Apple products.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Need I elaborate?   
   >>>> I hope not.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now to the blame game that Apple _always_ plays.   
   >>>> *You're holding it wrong* and "The batteries that made me do it*.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's a pattern with Apple to blame everyone but Apple, right?   
   >>>> Well lookey' here.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Apple just blamed a dozen (or so) entities for the problem, right?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now, here's the adult question to ask of you (or anyone else)...   
   >>>> *How many of those entities that Apple blamed - did not exist prior?*   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The answer is zero, right?   
   >>>> Right?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Every single entity that Apple blamed existed _prior_ to the release!   
   >>>> That's just a fact.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This means the real problem is as simple as what I've proven for years.   
   >>>> *Apple forgot to sufficiently test their design before releasing it*   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's really that simple, is it not?   
   >>>> Do you agree?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Or disagree?   
   >>>> Why or why not?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Why should they put all those resources into testing their software when   
   >>> there are millions of people available to do it for free? It’s not like   
   >>> anyone is going to stop using the iPhone if they found a bug. The only way   
   >>> most people would drop Apple is if they started losing trust in them…   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You have it precisely backwards.   
   >>   
   >> It is because there are "millions of people" using their iPhones in   
   >> millions of different ways that there is no possible way that Apple   
   >> could test for all possible problems.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Thank you for admitting out loud Apple doesn’t test their software.   
   >   
      
   I didn't say anything like that.   
      
   You're either a liar, or your an idiot...   
      
   ...and that's not a XOR.   
      
   :-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)