XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: wolf@greenblatt.net   
      
   On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:11:35 -0700, sms wrote:   
      
   >> Why should they put all those resources into testing their software when   
   >> there are millions of people available to do it for free?   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > There is just no way that they could test all the different apps in all   
   > the different usage scenarios. It's expected that there will be issues   
   > that don't turn up until the devices are in the hands of a very large   
   > number of users.   
      
   Did you count the number of things that Apple didn't test until now?   
      
   > What will be interesting to see is if the A17 benchmarks change once iOS   
   > 17 is updated to address overheating.   
      
   Of course it will.   
   Apple cares so much about you that they'll again "extend the life" for you.   
      
   > Kuo stated that they'd have to   
   > throttle the CPU in order to address the overheating, in which case the   
   > benchmarks could be affected.   
      
   The benchmarks are bogus.   
   Even more so now that the iPhone performance will require cutting.   
      
   > "Those who must not be named" insisted   
   > that there is no issue because not every user has reported overheating,   
   > though they now are aware that the issue is real. The truth will come   
   > out soon enough.   
      
   Apple already said they have identified many causes for the overheating.   
   Which means they are overheating.   
   Which means anyone saying they're not is disagreeing with Apple's findings.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)