a63629f7   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: walterjones@invalid.nospam   
      
   Dorper  wrote   
      
   >> I'll assume this conversation will stay at the adult level, OK?   
   >   
   > How about you don't write like a condescending shithead, alright?   
   > It does you no favors.   
      
   Asking you to simply act like an adult didn't last long with you, did it?   
      
   >> there aren't   
   >> usually many remediation to widespread overheating than simply decreasing   
   >> performance (either of the apps causing the overheating, or the CPU speed).   
   >   
   > Wrong. Most temp issues are a result of software, not hardware.   
      
   Remember, I had asked you to remain an adult, didn't I?   
   Why can't you comprehend then what any normal adult would have understood?   
      
   Nobody ever said the defects were in hardware; certainly I never said that.   
   If you can't comprehend simple sentences, then you've lost your adult hat.   
      
   I repeat since you don't seem to comprehend at the adult cognitive levels:   
    *Nobody said the defects were in hardware - everyone said they're bugs!*   
      
   Is that explicit enough for you to put your adult hat back on, Dorper?   
      
   Here... I'll drop the problem set down to the cognitive level you express.   
   a. Apple fucked up (again)   
   b. Apple forgot to test the iPhone (again)   
   c. Apple is currently blaming everyone but Apple (again)   
      
   All those statements, lowered to your expressed level of cognition, are   
   simply facts that everyone knows. What we're trying to assess here, if we   
   remain at the adult level of cognition that is, is how Apple is going to   
   fix the bugs.   
      
   Apple has no choice but to reduce the performance of the defective iPhones.   
   The only question here is _how_ is Apple going to reduce that performance.   
      
   >  You are stuck   
   > in the 80s with round robin schedulers and the only way to lower temp being   
   > to lower clk or add more fans.   
      
   I think you fail to comprehend the fundamental adult point of this thread.   
    *It's Apple - not me - who is telling us how they'll reduce performance.*   
      
   All the cues are coming from Apple.   
   Not from me.   
      
   I'm just citing what Apple has said they will do to reduce the performance.   
      
   Why are you Apple aficionados so deathly afraid of the truth about Apple?   
   A. Apple said themselves there are multiple divergent software bugs   
   B. Apple said themselves they will strive to retain "long term" performance   
   C. Apple said themselves they will strive to retain "top" performance   
   D. Strongly saying there won't be a A17 Pro "chip performance" reduction   
      
   Note all the weasel words that an actual adult would know the meaning of.   
   1. Apple's obvious embarrassment regarding "the bug" versus very many bugs   
   2. "long-term performance" versus short-term performance   
   3. "top performance" versus the performance the rest of the time   
   4. "chip performance" versus WTF? Bus speed? Clock Speed? What?   
      
   > You do not apply to principle of charity to anything I say or anything anyone   
   > else says, assuming the worst possible interpretation. Plus, none of your   
   > replies actually addresses what I am saying. Behaving completely   
   > disinterested in having a technical discussion.   
      
   It's you who has failed to comprehend the adult nature of this discussion.   
      
    *The technical discussion here is what do Apple's own cited words mean?*   
      
   Apple said how they would _not_ reduce the performance of the defective   
   iPhones; but the question Apple did not answer yet is how they will.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)