XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2023-11-22 21:43, John wrote:
> On 11/22/2023 9:16 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2023-11-23, Alan wrote:
>>> On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
>>>> Jolly Roger wrote
>>>>
>>>>>> the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
>>>>>> headphonesi
>>>>>
>>>>> Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
>>>>> didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial
>>>>> factually incorrect post.
>>>>
>>>> Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
>>>> knew?
>>>>
>>>> It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
>>>> wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
>>>> comprehension.
>>>
>>> Here is his entire first post on the subject:
>>>
>>> 'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
>>> Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
>>> 15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy
>>> an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
>>> high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with
>>> Apple from an Apple fan. '
>>>
>>> Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
>>>
>>> That would be great!
>>
>> He won't because he *can't*, because the weak troll is weak. Their
>> emotional and intellectual intelligence is woefully inept, because they
>> are mental weaklings.
>>
> 192/24 bit is not possible even with wired headphones. Therefore my
> statement was completely accurate.
Nope.
Still wrong!
'To listen to songs at sample rates higher than 48 kHz, you need an
external digital-to-analog converter'
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
