XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: walterjones@invalid.nospam   
      
   *Hemidactylus*  wrote   
      
   > I posted multiple links showing the whole concept of D-K itself is flawed   
   > and instead of acknowledging that you march out some trivial graphs and   
   > still cling to the concept. This shows you are an uncritical ideologue. No   
   > surprise there. It¢s like me saying phrenology is flawed and pointing to   
   > some expert debunkings and you asking me to examine a bump on your head   
   > because head bumps are fundamental to understanding your idee fixe of   
   > iKooks.   
      
   You don't even _understand_ the D-K papers, Hemidactylus.   
   And you claim they're flawed?   
      
   What kind of strange person does that?   
   You iKooks do.   
      
   But normal people don't do that.   
   Again. You need to read the seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus.   
      
   HINT: Every single person with any skill is on those Dunning-Kruger graphs.   
      
   Note that if you don't even know _that_, then you know nothing about D-K.   
   Which is my point.   
      
   You iKooks are so incredibly stupid that you "think" you know everything.   
   And yet... you know absolutely nothing.   
      
   a. Jolly Roger knows nothing about how Apple updates releases.   
      (but that doesn't stop him from claiming Apple fully updates all)   
   b. Alan Browne knows nothing about the walled garden.   
      (but that doesn't stop him from claiming it simply doesn't exist)   
   c. Alan Baker knows nothing about just about everything.   
      (but that doesn't stop him from calling absolutely all facts a lie)   
   etc.   
      
   What's no longer shocking about you iKooks, Hemidactylus, is that you are   
   so very confident that you think you know something - and yet - you know   
   absolutely nothing.   
      
   It's so easy to prove you iKooks know absolutely nothing, Hemidactylus.   
      
   Look at this example where Alan Baker claimed header lines can't be changed   
       
      
   Who is _that_ stupid?   
   Nobody right?   
      
   But you iKooks are.   
   Alan Baker knows nothing about headers, yet he still confidently claims   
   (over and over again) that they can't be spoofed. Who is that stupid?   
      
   You are the same as Alan Baker, Hemidactylus.   
      
   You know nothing about D-K - and that's clearly shown many times over.   
   And yet, you feel so very confident to claim it's flawed?   
      
   What kind of strange person does that, Hemidactylus?   
   --   
   Every iKook tries to make facts go away with their childish taunts.   
   a. iKook [JR] person calls people "losers" & he thinks that is clever.   
   b. iKook [Baker] calls people "gay" & thinks he's being very clever.   
   c. iKook [Browne] calls people an "it", thinking that's oh so very clever.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)