XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system
From: walterjones@invalid.nospam
*Hemidactylus* wrote
>> No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
>>
> I was referring to your "Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this
> newsgroup, Hemidactylus." creeper.
Hi Hemidactylus,
I read everything you post to this newsgroup, so it's not surprising to me
that you consider anyone who does, a creep. It says more about you than me.
All you iKooks are Dunning-Kruger first quartile, where nobody I've ever
gone to school with or worked with in the Silicon Valley was even close.
That's why you strange abnormally low-IQ iKooks interest me so much.
>> Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile that
>> you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think you're a genius.
>>
> So you make up some fictitious category "iKooks" lacking real application
> in the world and still cling to the illusory statistical artifact of the
> D-K graph.
Did you notice nobody would put Ant or badgolferman or Steve Scharf in the
iKook category. Does it ever occur to you why they're not iKooks & you are?
Even Hank Rogers isn't an iKook (as far as I can tell from what he writes).
The people who are iKooks are Your Name, nospam, Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan
Browne, Alan Baker, Snit, Connor Shannon, et al. They're all of abnormally
low IQ, but that alone isn't what makes you iKooks iKooks, Hemidactylus.
If you don't know, by now, what makes you an iKook, well then, that's proof
positive that I'm correct about everything I've said about you iKooks.
> Then you pretend to lecture me about anything. Silly ignorant kook.
I find it interesting that you are ashamed of what you are, Hemidactylus.
I feel sorry for you low-IQ iKooks because your whole life people told you
that you were stupid. They told you that everything you say is stupid.
And now I'm telling you the same things you've been told all along.
>> It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are, Hemidactylus.
>>
>> Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as
>> it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.
>
> How would you know?
Heh heh heh... How would I know that Alan Baker doesn't know the first
thing about anything? Have you _ever_ heard him say anything intelligent?
> Aren't you a mere dilettante at best?
Heh heh heh... like I said, Hemidactylus. I never claimed to be a racer.
But I do claim to have higher education.
Which means I understand what a catenary is.
And how it applies to racing.
By contrast, Alan Baker has never heard of a catenary in his entire life.
Even after desperately googling it, he still can't figure out what it is.
And yet, it's one of the most important racing terms there ever was.
> Maybe you're way out of your league.
That's what nospam told me when he claimed imaginary wi-fi debugging tools,
Hemidactylus. That's what Jolly Roger told me when he claimed Apple fully
supports older releases, Hemidactylus. That's what Alan Browne told me when
he claimed he's never noticed the walled garden so he says it can't exist.
Do you think you telling me that you're too stupid to understand a catenary
is your best way of trying to tell me that I'm not in your league?
You know you've been called stupid your entire life.
Do you think I don't know it?
> I don't trust you to convey much of anything accurately
> as you're just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a GED and a
> mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
And yet, the fact remains that the iKooks call people an 'it' because they
hate that those people tell them facts about Apple products that they hate.
--
What makes iKooks so interesting is that they don't even realize everything
they say tells me they've always been called stupid their entire lives.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
