XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2023-12-21 00:40, Wally J wrote:   
   > *Hemidactylus*  wrote   
   >   
   >>> Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word   
   >>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?   
   >>   
   >> Oh great an obsessive stalker.   
   >   
   > No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.   
   >   
   > Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if he   
   > desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing, particularly   
   > when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers depending on the track.   
      
   1. I don't race a "beemer" or a BMW. I race a 1998 Formula F Van Diemen   
   RF98 Honda.   
      
      
   >   
   > If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to hold   
   > yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms after all.   
      
   2. The challenge is on YOU, Arlen.   
      
   >   
   > Yet he doesn't.   
   > So he won't.   
      
   I'm pretty sure I know how YOU think it's significant...   
      
   ...but you're wrong.   
      
   >   
   > Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as   
   > it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.   
      
   It really isn't.   
      
   I've:   
      
   Attended 3 racing schools.   
      
   Raced for a decade.   
      
   Taught racing since 2017.   
      
   And no one has ever used that term.   
      
   Not once.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)