XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.apps   
   From: ithinkiam@gmail.com   
      
   *Hemidactylus*  wrote:   
   > Alan  wrote:   
   >> On 2023-12-24 09:37, Wally J wrote:   
   >>> *Hemidactylus*  wrote   
   >>>   
   >>>> Racist pig.   
   >>>   
   >>> The child-like uneducated low-IQ ignorant iKooks lack the basic adult   
   >>> capacity to comprehend even the simplest of concepts such as a catenary.   
   >>   
   >> Wait...   
   >>   
   >> ...I thought it was ME who couldn't understand what a catenary   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Nor can these child-like uneducated low-IQ ignorant iKooks comprehend that   
   >>> everyone (yes, everyone!) fits in one of the D-K test results quartiles.   
   >>>   
   >>> Given those two facts, how could anyone have expected these child-like   
   >>> uneducated low-IQ ignorant iKooks to comprehend Apple's marketing strategy?   
   >>>   
   >>>> No surprise.   
   >>>   
   >>> Actually, I'm surprised you're the only one who responded that way, as you   
   >>> are already on record for making guesses as to what's in the cites, without   
   >>> ever bothering to look at the cites.   
   >>>   
   >>> There were two types of cites in the OP:   
   >>> 1. The first type were examples of Apple's marketing   
   >>> 2. The second type were _analysis_ of Apple's marketing   
   >>>   
   >>>> He already others based on the statistically   
   >>>> suspect Dunning Kruger effect that he is incapable to realize has flaws   
   >>>> given his pseudointellectual tendencies.   
   >>>   
   >>> What I said about D-K was I read (and understood) the seminal papers.   
   >>> You did not.   
   >>>   
   >>> What you don't understand, for example, is everyone fits on the D-K scale.   
   >>> That's why they have those quartile markers.   
   >>>   
   >>> You have noticed the D-K quartile markers, Hemidactylus, haven't you?   
   >>> What do _you_ think they're there for?   
   >>>   
   >>>> He criticizes Alan who is an expert in teaching of car racing skills   
   >>>> because he allegedly knows more than anyone else about everything.   
   >>>   
   >>> Now you're being too nice to me, Hemidactylus, in praising my skills.   
   >>> I clearly stated I know nothing about racing. I said I understood bimmers.   
   >>>   
   >>> Once you're well educated, you learn enough to know two important things:   
   >>> a. Other well educated people know more than you do in their fields, and,   
   >>> b. You can easily apply your vast education to other fields (e.g., racing).   
   >>>   
   >>> What I _said_ was that the catenary is a specific shape for an extremely   
   >>> important reason, having all to do with Newtonian forces in nature.   
   >>   
   >> And an object that is supporting it's own weight in a (semi-)continuous   
   >> manner...   
   >>   
   >> ...which isn't anything a racing car is doing when it goes around a corner.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> As such, it's one of the most important curves possible in racing circuits,   
   >>> and the fact that someone quoted Alan Baker as saying he's never even heard   
   >>> of the catenary, is a problem because an "expert" isn't that ignorant.   
   >>   
   >> Not one of the instructors I've worked with...   
   >>   
   >> ...dozens...   
   >>   
   >> ...nor any of the books on race driving   
   >>   
   >> ...has ever mentioned it.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Braggart knuckledragger.   
   >>>   
   >>> I realize all you iKooks lack education so your only defense to knowledge   
   >>> that everyone else has attained except you, is to try to insult them.   
   >>>   
   >>> But wouldn't it be better if you took a Physics or Calculus class and   
   >>> simply learned what a catenary is and how it applies to racing circuits?   
   >>>   
   >>>> He is the punchline of the joke he starts but can't finish.   
   >>>   
   >>> What's patently clear is you do not know what a catenary is, Hemidactylus.   
   >>> Therefore, you do not know how a catenary applies to the forces of nature.   
   >>> Nor, as a result, are you aware of how those forces apply to racing.   
   >>>   
   >>> The fact that EVERYONE on the planet who has taken a Physics or Calculus   
   >>> class knows EXACTLY what a catenary is - and you and Alan Baker do not -   
   >>> is the reason that your only response to facts is to try to insult the   
   >>> bearer.   
   >>   
   >> I know exactly what a catenary is...   
   >>   
   >> ...and I learned it when I studied physics and calculus...   
   >>   
   >> ...in both high school AND university.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Instead of claiming I am a "knuckedragger" because _you_ don't know what a   
   >>> catenary is...  why don't you - instead - look up how a catenary applies   
   >>> the Newtonian forces of nature to the teaching of proper racing circuits).   
   >>   
   >> It doesn't. That isn't the curve a racing vehicle takes around a corner.   
   >>   
   >> If you ask nicely, I'll tell you what is.   
   >>   
   >> :-)   
   >>   
   > Given I know a thing or two about lateral genetic transfer in bacteria and   
   > immunology in humans he just wound up flying into my cobweb. I lack   
   > advanced degrees though.   
      
   So does he. He has read some (old) books apparently and is able to take   
   pictures of them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)