XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 11/13/24 4:15 PM, Andrews wrote:   
   > -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :   
   >   
   >> And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims   
   >> have used catenary?   
   >   
   > A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".   
      
   Pedantically, sure ...   
      
   > It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of   
   > force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.   
      
   ...but pragmatically, the reason why catenary doesn't apply to laeral   
   non-gravitational based forces is because it is difficult for them to be   
   sufficiently homogeneous: this theoretical doesn'tpragmatically occur in   
   reality.   
      
   Case in point, if this factor really was as significant as you're trying   
   to imply that it is, then the real world ramifications are that during   
   races, there would *never* able to be any passing in corners.   
      
      
   > My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of   
   > the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.   
      
   But they're not who needs to think things through more completely,   
   particularly in looking at theory vs applied.   
      
      
   > [more reams of butthurt whining ... snipped]   
      
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)