Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.mobile.ipad    |    Discussion about the Apple Ipad    |    72,997 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 72,812 of 72,997    |
|    Tom Elam to Marion    |
|    Re: There is no common consumer device _    |
|    24 Jun 25 11:55:26    |
      XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: thomas.e.elam@gmail.com              On 6/5/2025 11:14 PM, Marion wrote:       > There is no common consumer device _less_ private than iOS!       > Or is there?       >       > That is the question....       >       > This deserves its own thread because Apple owners are generally completely       > ignorant of how Apple devices operate as dumb terminals, simply becasue       > Apple owners are, by and large, herd animals who never use their brains.       >       > Given Apple's (brilliant) marketing advertises otherwise, Apple owners are       > clueless that there is no common consumer operating system _less_ private       > than an iOS device is.       >       > One of the reasons the privacy of every other common consumer operating       > system is NOT available with iOS, is the requirement for a mothership       > login.       >       > With that login, Apple keeps track of an *immense* amount of data about       > you. Meanwhile, Microsoft and Google can't do that, unless you're dumb       > enough to create a mothership login on Windows or Android.       >       > But we know computers so we're not that stupid.       > Well, Apple owners don't understand this.       >       > Which is why I bring it up to the fore.       >       > If you think an Apple device is NOT the least private common consumer       > device out there, please let us know why you think that's not the case?       >       > Note: You might think you could just not create an Apple account on that       > device, but most of your native software will not be updated over time; so       > that's not even a realistic option (compared to not creating a mothership       > account on Windows or Android - which has no negative implications).       >       > =============< original post below >====================       >       >       > On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 19:17:33 -0400, Joel wrote :       >       >       >>> Lots of people don't want to use either one of those.       >>       >> Yeah, sure, they want their video games, commercial apps, it's       >> pathetic. They know nothing like we know of computers.       >       > I turned off everything I could when I set up Windows 10 long ago.       > Anytime something shows up, I kill it as soon as I figure what it is.       > I pity people who don't know how computers work who don't do that.       >       > Take Android users, for example.       > Certainly I don't have a Google Account set up on that phone.       > Even though, if I wanted to, I could use Google products.       > a. I can get email - I just have to use FairEmail (or equivalent)       > b. I can navigate - I just have to NOT log into Google Maps       > c. I can subscribe to YouTube channels - I just use NewPipe instead       > d. I can download apps off the Google repo - I just don't use Google Play       > e. I can do calendaring - I just use Etar instead of Google's calendar       > f. I can do messaging - I just use PulseSMS instead of Google messenger       > etc.       >       > It's much harder with my iOS devices since Apple hates you having privacy.       > The iOS device is by far the least private device that consumers own.       >       > What's super interesting is Apple owners actually think otherwise?       > Why?       >       > Because Apple told Apple owners that the iOS device is private.       > Even though there is no common consumer device _less_ private than iOS!       >       > Like I said, I pity people who don't know what we know about computers.       >                     Guess what? In the near future Google will require 2FA to logon. For       most people that means supplying a phone number. Many financial       institutions and other sites including social networking already require       2FA. Cell phones are really handy for getting text messages.              You go to a LOT of trouble to avoid the convenience of a Google account.       Most people don't seem to care that much.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca