XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: marion@facts.com   
      
   On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:55:35 +0200, Arno Welzel wrote :   
      
      
   > An iPhone 16 would not work for me and my typical use cases.   
      
   An iPhone 16 lacks fundamental hardware, and, based on the recent June 20th   
   2025 regulatory filings required in the EU that Apple knew about for years   
   and that Apple was on the committee that established the standards, Apple   
   iPhones literally suck at efficiency, as reported by independent agency   
   hired by Apple (which is the same agency almost every OEM hired out).   
      
   Fancy that fact.   
   Apple MARKETING has been touting an amorphous "efficiency" for years.   
      
   And yet...   
   It's one of the worst performing phones on efficiency in its class.   
      
   Almost every major Android OEM had multiple phones with an "A" rating.   
   Only Apple couldn't garner anywhere near an "A", settling for a "B".   
      
   What's hilarious is Apple spent pages and pages making excuses for why the   
   iPhone sucks on efficiency, even as Apple used the *same* outfit to test   
   their phones as everyone else and even as both that outfit and Apple have   
   been part of the standards committee for years - and even as Apple was well   
   aware of those standards for years.   
      
   Who believes Apple's lies when you know that?   
   HINT: Apple trolls do.   
      
   But what intelligent person believes Apples lies in this document?   
       
      
   Specifically why only Apple has to lie with excuse after excuse after   
   excuse, when nobody else needed to lie. They simply reported the result.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)