XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2025-07-01 16:22, -hh wrote:   
   > On 7/1/25 18:35, Alan wrote:   
   >> On 2025-07-01 14:42, Marion wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:45:35 -0400, -hh wrote :   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Absolutely. I agree. Nothing wrong, per se, with a "B" score.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Which means that your claim (still quoted above) that Apple has   
   >>>> "dismally failed in efficiency." is a flat-out lie.   
   >>>   
   >>> You can take it as a lie but I said very clearly the iPhone earned a B.   
   >>> I said all the Android OEMs earned an A rating. And a G was really bad.   
   >>   
   >> You said it...   
   >>   
   >> ...but you've not supported it, let alone proven it.   
   >   
   > I've not seen a product chart list, have you?   
      
   Well there's a website...   
      
   ...but searching it to show that some OEM or other didn't get a single   
   "A" grade isn't really practical.   
      
   :-)   
      
   >   
   >   
   >>>>> Because Apple advertises they're more "efficient".   
   >>>>> And yet, they're not.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Incorrect:  they've merely not achieved the highest possible score on   
   >>>> this particular benchmark test that happens to be used in the EU.   
   >>>   
   >>> I knew iPhones would fare dismally simply because of the crappy   
   >>> batteries.   
   >>   
   >> A B is NOT a fail.   
   >   
   >   
   > Arlen's trying to claim it is because its not the highest possible   
   > grade.  Too bad he didn't know what you noted later, about how Apple   
   > tested as an "A" but decided to report as a "B".   
   >   
   > Plus battery performance are separate tests in the EU series, so trying   
   > to claim bad battery isn't relevant to this "efficiency" grade section.   
   >   
   > To use an automotive analogy, efficiency is equivalent to how many MPG a   
   > car gets ... which has nothing to do with its gas tank size (battery).   
      
   Arlen is convinced that a car with a smaller gas tank must be crappy...   
      
   ...despite it having a greater range than some other car with a larger   
   tank, but less fuel efficiency.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)