XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: marion@facts.com   
      
   On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 16:28:23 +0000, Tyrone wrote :   
      
      
   > One claim he makes IS supported by facts.   
      
   The problem with you religious zealots is you don't know any facts.   
      
   I have to teach you everything about Apple that you don't know.   
   Which is everything.   
      
   To wit:   
       
      
   FACT: *Almost every OEM earned an A in at least one model*   
                      *Except Apple*   
      
   Why can't any iPhone ever earn an A on efficiency when Apple marketing has   
   spent millions of dollars touting their supposed "efficiency" for decades?   
       
      
   Hint: Apple lied.   
         The proof is not a single iPhone can earn an A on efficiency.   
         Yet almost every Android OEM sold in Europe was able to do it.   
      
   1. Go to the EPREL database:    
   2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"   
         
   3. Search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.   
      
   FACTS:   
    The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A).   
    The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Fairphone Gen.6 FP6 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Nokia HMD TA-1600 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Nothing CMF A001 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Samsung SM-S937B/DS S24 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
    The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)