XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 7/2/25 18:00, Marion wrote:   
   > On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 16:28:23 +0000, Tyrone wrote :   
   >   
   >   
   >> One claim he makes IS supported by facts.   
   >   
   > The problem with you religious zealots is you don't know any facts.   
   >   
   > I have to teach you everything about Apple that you don't know.   
   > Which is everything.   
   >   
   > To wit:   
   >      
   >   
   > FACT: *Almost every OEM earned an A in at least one model*   
   >                     *Except Apple*   
   >   
   > Why can't any iPhone ever earn an A on efficiency when Apple marketing has   
   > spent millions of dollars touting their supposed "efficiency" for decades?   
   >      
   >   
   > Hint: Apple lied.   
   >        The proof is not a single iPhone can earn an A on efficiency.   
   >        Yet almost every Android OEM sold in Europe was able to do it.   
   >   
   > 1. Go to the EPREL database:    
   > 2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"   
   >        
   > 3. Search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.   
   >   
   > FACTS:   
   >   The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A).   
   >   The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   Not going to mention the "F"s on the ASUS CM3001DM2 and CL3001DM2?   
      
   >   The Fairphone Gen.6 FP6 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   Not going to mention the Fairphone 5 5G - Model: FP5 getting a "B"?   
      
   >   The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   And the Google's G6GPR, GZC4K, & GTF7P models which all got "B"s?   
      
   >   The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   ABR-NX1?  "B".  BRP-NX1M?  "B".   
      
   >   The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   Yet their g56 5G (XT2529-2) scored a "B".   
   Ditto the g75 5G (XT2437-3), g35 5G (XT2433-5), Moto Edge 50 (XT2407-1),   
   and g55 5G (XT2435-2):  all "B"s.   
      
   >   The Nokia HMD TA-1600 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
   >   The Nothing CMF A001 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
   >   The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
   >   The Samsung SM-S937B/DS S24 rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   Guess what score Samsung's models SM-G766B, SM-A566B/DS, SM-S931B/DS,   
   SM-S936B/DS, SM-S938B/DS, SM-A165F/DSB, SM-A166B/DS, SM-S721B/DS got?   
   Yup, all "B"s ...   
      
   ... but their SM-A266B/DS and SM-A366B/DS models scored "C"s.   
      
      
   >   The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A" (with A being the best).   
      
   Also their 25010PN30G, for sometimes even a Blind Squirrel finds a Nut.   
      
   In the meantime, there's also the claim that "almost every Android ..   
   was able to do it"...   
      
   ...but in checking that database, filtered on Android & Smartphone, we   
   find that in the the first 100 items listed, 65 of them (~2/3rds) fail.   
      
   For a score of "B", this included:  OUKITEL (10), CUBOT (5), emporia   
   (2), Blackview (4), UMIDIGI (5), Shenzhen Jiaqi (1), HOTWAV (1), JCB   
   Phone (2), Redmi (1)   
      
   But there were also "C"s from: DOOGEE (17), CUBOT (5), Ainuevo (1),   
   Shenzhen Redbeat (1), FOSSIBOT (3)   
      
   And even lower scores:   
   "D" - TABWEE, Zenva   
   "E" - Shenzhen Xindali, CUBOT (2)   
   "F" - AODOEU   
   "G" - CUBOT   
      
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)