XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2025-07-03 04:17, -hh wrote:
> On 7/2/25 18:00, Marion wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 16:28:23 +0000, Tyrone wrote :
>>
>>
>>> One claim he makes IS supported by facts.
>>
>> The problem with you religious zealots is you don't know any facts.
>>
>> I have to teach you everything about Apple that you don't know.
>> Which is everything.
>>
>> To wit:
>> > smartphones-and-tablets_en#energy-label>
>>
>> FACT: *Almost every OEM earned an A in at least one model*
>> *Except Apple*
>>
>> Why can't any iPhone ever earn an A on efficiency when Apple marketing
>> has
>> spent millions of dollars touting their supposed "efficiency" for
>> decades?
>> > fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/
>> EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf>
>>
>> Hint: Apple lied.
>> The proof is not a single iPhone can earn an A on efficiency.
>> Yet almost every Android OEM sold in Europe was able to do it.
>>
>> 1. Go to the EPREL database:
>> 2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"
>> > smartphonestablets20231669>
>> 3. Search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.
>>
>> FACTS:
>> The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A).
>> The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> Not going to mention the "F"s on the ASUS CM3001DM2 and CL3001DM2?
>
>> The Fairphone Gen.6 FP6 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> Not going to mention the Fairphone 5 5G - Model: FP5 getting a "B"?
>
>> The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> And the Google's G6GPR, GZC4K, & GTF7P models which all got "B"s?
>
>> The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> ABR-NX1? "B". BRP-NX1M? "B".
>
>> The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> Yet their g56 5G (XT2529-2) scored a "B".
> Ditto the g75 5G (XT2437-3), g35 5G (XT2433-5), Moto Edge 50 (XT2407-1),
> and g55 5G (XT2435-2): all "B"s.
>
>> The Nokia HMD TA-1600 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>> The Nothing CMF A001 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>> The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>> The Samsung SM-S937B/DS S24 rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> Guess what score Samsung's models SM-G766B, SM-A566B/DS, SM-S931B/DS,
> SM-S936B/DS, SM-S938B/DS, SM-A165F/DSB, SM-A166B/DS, SM-S721B/DS got?
> Yup, all "B"s ...
>
> ... but their SM-A266B/DS and SM-A366B/DS models scored "C"s.
>
>
>> The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A" (with A being the best).
>
> Also their 25010PN30G, for sometimes even a Blind Squirrel finds a Nut.
>
> In the meantime, there's also the claim that "almost every Android ..
> was able to do it"...
>
> ...but in checking that database, filtered on Android & Smartphone, we
> find that in the the first 100 items listed, 65 of them (~2/3rds) fail.
>
> For a score of "B", this included: OUKITEL (10), CUBOT (5), emporia
> (2), Blackview (4), UMIDIGI (5), Shenzhen Jiaqi (1), HOTWAV (1), JCB
> Phone (2), Redmi (1)
>
> But there were also "C"s from: DOOGEE (17), CUBOT (5), Ainuevo (1),
> Shenzhen Redbeat (1), FOSSIBOT (3)
>
> And even lower scores:
> "D" - TABWEE, Zenva
> "E" - Shenzhen Xindali, CUBOT (2)
> "F" - AODOEU
> "G" - CUBOT
>
>
>
> -hh
And if one examines Apple devices' actual numbers (not the letter
rating, but the endurance times), one can easily see that Apple has
rounded down the numbers.
iPhone 15 34h 00min
iPhone 16 37h 00min
iPhone 16e 41h 00min
iPhone 15 Plus 45h 00min
iPhone 16 Plus 48h 00min
:-)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
