XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: marion@facts.com   
      
   On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:27:47 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :   
      
      
   >> That is an assertion unsupported by any facts.   
   >>   
   >   
   > You remind me of this guy that I debate sports with. I back up my points   
   > with actual cites and examples, but all he does is say ´nope¡ without   
   > actually debating the topic or providing counter cites.   
      
   Hi badgolferman,   
      
   As you know, I study the people who post to this newsgroup, where it's so   
   unnatural how desperate the uneducated Apple trolls are to deny facts.   
      
   Who on earth would deny that official legal EU/UK regulations that were   
   years in the making with input from all the OEMS and which were extremely   
   well publicized in the news (I knew about them since about 2021 or so) and   
   where the official testing agencies were included all along... happened.   
      
   Who would deny that which nobody sensible who knew anything would deny?   
      
   Only these uneducated Apple trolls do that on this newsgroup, right?   
   Why?   
      
   Specifically, why are Apple trolls claiming that this legal EPREL database   
   suddenly "just happened" to Apple - as if Apple didn't even know about it?   
      
   What kind of person requires us to prove that fundamental fact to them?   
   (Just like as with your sports friend.)   
      
   Do they seriously think that by casting aspersions on the entire formal   
   legal process (which was years in the making), that they can then deny the   
   basic fact that all Android OEMs managed to earn at least one A in   
   efficiency, while none of the Apple iPhones could achieve that efficiency?   
      
   What kind of person does that?   
   Why can't they simply accept that Apple was part of the process all along?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)