XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: ithinkiam@gmail.com   
      
   Marion  wrote:   
   > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:45:35 -0400, -hh wrote :   
   >   
   >   
   >>> Absolutely. I agree. Nothing wrong, per se, with a "B" score.   
   >>   
   >> Which means that your claim (still quoted above) that Apple has   
   >> "dismally failed in efficiency." is a flat-out lie.   
   >   
   > You can take it as a lie but I said very clearly the iPhone earned a B.   
   > I said all the Android OEMs earned an A rating.   
      
   Which is false.   
      
   > And a G was really bad.   
      
   So if any android gets a G rating, that's bad, right?   
      
   >   
   >>> Because Apple advertises they're more "efficient".   
   >>> And yet, they're not.   
   >>   
   >> Incorrect:  they've merely not achieved the highest possible score on   
   >> this particular benchmark test that happens to be used in the EU.   
   >   
   > I knew iPhones would fare dismally simply because of the crappy batteries.   
      
   No you didn't. You claimed certain models would fail the new regulations   
   and would have to be removed. You also claimed they failed the tests two   
   years before June 2025. Neither claim you stand by.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)