om@news.eternal-september.org> a3f1f880   
   XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   Nashton  wrote:   
   > On 2025-07-01 3:15 p.m., -hh wrote:   
   >> On 7/1/25 12:06, Marion wrote:   
   >>> ...   
   >>> Yet, only Apple phones dismally failed in efficiency.   
   >>   
   >> Where your claimed 'failure' was a grade of a "B" instead of an "A".   
   >>   
   >> YMMV, but I recall "B" as always having been a passing grade.   
   >>   
   >>> That is not under debate.   
   >>   
   >> Where "That" is that they got a passing grade of a "B", and that you're   
   >> still whining and butthurt about it as a justification to troll.   
   >>   
   >> In the meantime, let's not forget how there's been many companies who   
   >> have deliberately gamed various benchmark tests, which illustrates that   
   >> such tests can have limited relevance & value to end consumers.  Those   
   >> who wish to disagree can start with showing how there was no harm ever   
   >> caused to consumers by manufacturers who rigged GPU tests on PC boards.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   > Ever managed to master the focus function on your camera, dummy?   
      
      
      
      
   And to think that I was going to pass on reminding you that you still   
   haven’t delivered on your promise to post photos of your then-new Audi Q7   
   that you had been trying to brag about before you skanked off.   
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)