XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.comp.os.windows-10   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Arlen,   
      
   >> You have a history of claiming that and similar, but always "forgetting"   
   >> to   
   >> provide support for it.  Your assurance here is therefore worth   
   >> absolutily   
   >> nothing.   
   >   
   > Name a single fact I stated in the post to Chris you feel is wrong.   
      
   I'm sorry that you could not parse my post far enough to see that I already   
   gave you several.  Not really my problem though.   
      
   Besides, you have always refused to do so when I asked you for the same.   
   Why should I do anything different ?   
      
   But I got a cite fore you : news:10atkq4$2sgsa$2@dont-email.me .  Its in   
   there, you only have to read and find it.   
      
   > Do you even understand the difference (between fact & assessment of fact)?   
      
   And you doubt I do on the basis of .... what ?   
      
   > This is a fact:   
   > iOS has had about 1-1/2 times the known exploits as had Android.   
      
   Ah yes, the old "lets try to change the subject" attempt.  Rejected.   
      
   > Note that it takes no brains to claim that cite   
      
   Ah yes, your old bluntly ignoring of facts that are brought forward by   
   anyone than yourself I see.  In this case that a simple link isn't a cite.   
      
   > doesn't say that fact, but it takes actual intelligence to pull   
   > the information out of that cite.   
      
   I sincerely doubt that it needed intelligence.  You *wanted* to find   
   something in there, so you did.   
      
   I could ask you to quote everything you based your assessment on and   
   show/explain how you combined them, but you and I (and likely everyone else   
   here) already know that you will refuse to do so.   
      
      
   And remarkable, although my post was about Windows and Android, you *had* to   
   talk about IOS here, and nothing else.   But don't worry, i'm sure nobody   
   noticed it ...   
      
   > It takes nothing to refute facts, Rudy.   
      
   Indeed, as you've always show us by refusing to respond to any of the facts   
   we post.   
      
   > But it takes intelligence to comprehend facts, Rudy.   
      
   Absolutily.  Your point ?   
      
   [snip some ranting]   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)