XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: ithinkiam@gmail.com
Marion wrote:
> badgolferman wrote:
>> Tyrone wrote:
>>>
>>> Apple - with arguably as many (or more) hardware and software products than
>>> Microsoft
>>
>> https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share
>
> iOS consistently has more in-the-wild zero-days than Android flagships.
>
>
> In some years, the difference is 3–4 times more than Pixels + Galaxies.
> 2020 zero-days: iOS = 5 Pixel/Galaxy = 2
> 2021 zero-days: iOS = 12 Pixel/Galaxy = 3
> 2022 zero-days: iOS = 9 Pixel/Galaxy = 2
> 2023 zero-days: iOS = 13 Pixel/Galaxy = 3
> 2024 zero-days: iOS = 10 Pixel/Galaxy = 2
> 2025 zero-days: iOS = 7 Pixel/Galaxy = 2
>
> Pixel devices get patched immediately (as Google controls the hw + sw).
>
>
> Galaxy devices lag slightly (a few weeks to a month) because Samsung
> has to integrate Google's fixes into One UI, but Samsung is still far
> ahead of most Android OEMs.
>
> iOS Rapid Security Response (since iOS 16) has improved patch speed,
> but it hasn't reduced the number of zero-days being exploited.
>
>
> 2020: iOS=5 Pix/Gal=2 Cum iOS=5 Cum Pix/Gal=2
> 2021: iOS=12 Pix/Gal=3 Cum iOS=17 Cum Pix/Gal=5
> 2022: iOS=9 Pix/Gal=2 Cum iOS=26 Cum Pix/Gal=7
> 2023: iOS=13 Pix/Gal=3 Cum iOS=39 Cum Pix/Gal=10
> 2024: iOS=10 Pix/Gal=2 Cum iOS=49 Cum Pix/Gal=12
> 2025: iOS=7 Pix/Gal=2 Cum iOS=56 Cum Pix/Gal=14
>
> But all of these are undercounts as zero-days are classified differently.
> For example, webkit zero-days are omitted in the above, as are chrome.
>
> But it gives us a rough idea where if the Apple trolls want to claim that
> iOS is "more secure" than Android flagships like Pixels & Galaxies, let's
> see their data.
What's the verifiable source of this data? Is it Bing + CoPilot?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
