XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, misc.phone.mobile.iphone   
   From: noreply@dirge.harmsk.com   
      
   Claas wrote:   
   >Fritz Wuehler wrote:   
   >   
   >> Claas, there's nothing modern or innovative with what you present us   
   >> here.  Type 2 remailing including nym servers stood the test of time,   
   >> whereas all of your strategies are old hat and dangerously flawed.   
   >   
   >Why do you call it TypeI remailing, when you know it is not?   
      
   So you're too ignorant to follow this:   
      
   Worse - That's a devastating flaw of your not so modern Type 1 system,   
   as padding only increases size and a larger message is doomed to stick   
   out like a sore thumb, whereas with Type 2 remailers all packets are of   
   equal size of 4 kB (Mixmaster) or 20 kB (YAMN) with larger messages   
   being split and reassembled at the exit remailer.  That's the main   
   reason why Type 1 remailing is obsolete and was abandoned years ago in   
   favour of Type 2 Mixmaster / YAMN!   
      
      
   >   
   >You can put the Onion Courier Mixnet as much as you want in a bad light,   
   >which might be even your duty, because you hate that it is not controlable   
   >by third parties, like you can do with the Mixmaster and YAMN Network, to   
   >even get your hands on remops.   
      
   You dream of a handful of anonymous remops, which makes it very easy for   
   an adversary to take over the network by adding a multitude of remailers   
   without anybody noticing that attack?  OMG!   
      
      
   > You hate the idea that people can easily   
   >run their own anonymous Mixnets worldwide for family and friends,   
   decentralized,   
   >and at home, while interacting with public mix node too, which you can't and   
   never   
   >will do with Mixmaster or YAMN, period!   
      
   That isn't a problem of Type 2 remailing, where you can also route its   
   standard mail packets through remailer related Tor Hidden Services.  It   
   just isn't done yet.   
      
      
   > OmniMix is also pretty much outdated due to   
   >it's GUI design, which even would not be useable on smartphones, should   
   Danner be   
   >capable to port it to Android or iOS.   
      
   For what reason carry around a server when it's accessible through Tor   
   Hidden Services?   
      
      
   > His OrMail is just a copy of my previous   
   >Onion Courier Network and Mini Mailer smtpdump+ Network.   
      
   Once again that lie?  You know exactly that it worked long before he   
   introduced the OrMail GUI or before you bothered us with your attempts   
   to reinvent the wheel.   
      
   Or are you really too stupid to remember "Re: Ping Stefan"   
   <20250414.023758.60358c31@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> and   
   <20250521.031545.e94ece2b@dirge.harmsk.com>?   
      
      
   >   
   >Old Mixnets like yours fail miserably, when comparing it to the Onion Courier   
   >Mixnet and *you know that*! You only can hide with Mixmaster,YAMN, *thanks to   
   Tor!*   
   >*Remember that!*   
      
   Once again wrong.  You try to hide behind a lie of omission.  Yes, with   
   OmniMix Tor is used to hide remailer activities from external observers,   
   but the real thing, reliable and secure anonymization, is done by the   
   Mixmaster or YAMN remailer network.   
      
      
   >   
   >People here in a.p.a-s can clearly see and distinguish between you guys and   
   people   
   >who do something for privacy and know something about it!   
      
   Well, it's easy to make you out to be a lying boaster.   
      
      
   >   
   >EOD   
      
   Understandable with all of your lies debunked.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)