Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.mobile.android    |    Discussion about Android-based devices    |    236,147 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 234,613 of 236,147    |
|    Carlos E.R. to AJL    |
|    Re: Smartwatch delay    |
|    01 Nov 25 20:23:29    |
      From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2025-11-01 17:51, AJL wrote:       > On 10/31/25 11:35 PM, Chris wrote:       >> AJL wrote:       >>>       >>> You're missing MY point. How does a few seconds accuracy on a watch       >>> make any       >>> difference in normal non-geek folks everyday life. It doesn't.       >>       >> I got your point. I agree it doesn't make a practical difference.       >> It does matter, however. As the expectation is that a watch is 100%       >> accurate.       >       > NO watch is 100% accurate. If you go out enough decimal places it will be       > off compared to a current standard.              The expectation for networked watches is 100% accuracy. It is different       if they are stand alone. Sure, a few seconds off true has no importance       in most of real life. But it means that there is something wrong in the       watch.              > Then of course it depends on your       > relative velocity compared to which standard you choose to compare it to.       > All impractical for most normal folks as we now apparently agree.       > But to keep this sometimes dead newsgroup alive I appreciate the       > discussion.       >       > And I might add that the time on my phone lockscreen is always right... ;)       >       >                     --       Cheers, Carlos.       ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca