Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.mobile.android    |    Discussion about Android-based devices    |    236,147 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 234,620 of 236,147    |
|    Carlos E.R. to AJL    |
|    Re: Smartwatch delay    |
|    01 Nov 25 22:59:10    |
      From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2025-11-01 22:24, AJL wrote:       > On 11/1/25 1:57 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >> On 2025-11-01 21:16, AJL wrote:       >>> On 11/1/25 12:23 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>> On 2025-11-01 17:51, AJL wrote:       >>>>> On 10/31/25 11:35 PM, Chris wrote:       >>>>>> AJL wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> You're missing MY point. How does a few seconds accuracy on a       >>>>>>> watch make any       >>>>>>> difference in normal non-geek folks everyday life. It doesn't.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I got your point. I agree it doesn't make a practical difference.       >>>>>> It does matter, however. As the expectation is that a watch is 100%       >>>>>> accurate.       >>>>>       >>>>> NO watch is 100% accurate. If you go out enough decimal places it       >>>>> will be       >>>>> off compared to a current standard.       >>>       >>>       >>>       >>>> The expectation for networked watches is 100% accuracy.       >>>       >>> I guess what you really mean then is that all timepieces on a network       >>> must       >>> agree to the second with the network base time. That's different from       >>> 100%       >>> accuracy with "real" time.       >>       >> Yes. Absolutely. My phone is actually off by half a second (this       >> instant), and some times more.       >>       >>>       >>>> It is different if they are stand alone. Sure, a few seconds off       >>>> true has no importance in most of real life. But it means that there       >>>> is something wrong in the watch.       >>>       >>> Dunno but don't think I would worry over a few seconds. Wait. I       >>> can't. My       >>> watch doesn't have a second hand... 8-O       >>       >> The worry is that they have the technology to do it. If they don't,       >> something is wrong. I'd like to know what is the cause.       >>       >> It is not that I worry by a few seconds.       >       > It sounds to me like you have too much TIME on your hands.       >       > Sorry, couldn't resist...       >       >              :-)              --       Cheers, Carlos.       ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca