Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.mobile.android    |    Discussion about Android-based devices    |    236,147 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 234,893 of 236,147    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= to Carlos E.R.    |
|    Re: Pixel 9 and 10 will have satellite S    |
|    28 Nov 25 23:32:52    |
      From: hugybear@gmx.net              On 28.11.25 20:49, Carlos E.R. wrote:       > On 2025-11-28 20:24, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >> On 2025-11-28 19:16, Jörg Lorenz wrote:       >>> On 28.11.25 13:22, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >>>> On 2025-11-28 12:22, Jörg Lorenz wrote:       >>>>> And I tell you once more: WA is not permitted to be used in the       >>>>> education sector, public institutions, military and law enforcement for       >>>>> good reasons.       >>>>       >>>> LOL. I know for a fat that the judiciary here is using it.       >>>> Politicians too.       >>>       >>> This is a bad lie. Can you deliver a proof, that anything official is       >>> sent by WA? Your post is just a unsubstantiated claim. Decisions are       >>> sent by registered letters.       >>       >> Read the reports about the top prosecutor case in Spain. It is public       >> knowledge, so I will not bother to send a precise link.       >       > Conversation with ChatGpt. If you do not trust it, make your own       > investigation. I asked in Spanish, then translated it with DeepL.       >       > Q: Was the attorney general using WhatsApp?       >       > It depends a little on what you mean by “using WhatsApp,” but       yes—Álvaro       > García Ortiz (attorney general) acknowledged that he has the WhatsApp       > application and that he usually deletes his messages for “security       > reasons.”              This is utter nonsense. This is a private activity and by no means       "official" just because the attorney is using WA. I assume that the       President of the Federal Council in Switzerland is using WA as well but       that does not mean it is legal if it is for official decisions. WA is       not a legal channel to spread official decisions.              Your Spanish case shows how important it is to forbid the use of       proprietary communication channels in a professional environment.              (lengthy irrelevant nonsense snipped)              That shows me your tendency to spread FUD and your inability to deal       with legal categories.              --       "Roma locuta, causa finita" (Augustinus)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca