Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.mobile.android    |    Discussion about Android-based devices    |    236,147 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 235,011 of 236,147    |
|    J. P. Gilliver to Carlos E.R.    |
|    Re: Drift: square-yard patches    |
|    04 Dec 25 13:50:58    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.internet.wireless       From: G6JPG@255soft.uk              On 2025/12/4 11:48:22, Carlos E.R. wrote:       > On 2025-12-04 12:20, J. P. Gilliver wrote:       >> On 2025/12/4 0:43:14, Marian wrote:       >>       >> []       >>       >>> What I love about Usenet is we all work together as a team, where each       >>> individual brings a completely different perspective to each discussion.       >>       >> This "minimum size" thing is certainly a different perspective! I don't       >> _think_ anywhere in the UK has a minimum property size rule. (I vaguely       >> remember - some decades ago - some people wanting to hinder development       >> in some area sold off a field in square-yard patches, ideally to people       >> abroad, thus making it difficult for any potential developer to even       >> _contact_ all the owners, and something might have been done to prevent       >> _that_, but we're talking many orders of magnitude different here!)       >        > Selling a field in square-yard patches? Really? Wow. The cost of the        > paperwork would be more than the land!       >        > Do you remember where this was? It is an idea, when the people want an       > area not to be developed.       >        Sorry, no - as I said, it was decades ago. I think some of the sales       were to Americans who liked the idea of owning a bit of the old country.       And those buying - whether Americans for that reason, or those who       agreed with the opposition to development - were willing to pay over the       odds, i. e. more than the land was _practically_ worth. I _think_       something was done to get over the requirement to contact all owners       (e. g. when "compulsory purchase" was involved), but I don't remember       any details, or even where it was (other than I'm pretty sure it was in       Britain, probably England).              >        >        (Gonna be hard to google, too: I just tried, but all I found were the       opposite - discussion of people buying "micro-plots" as investment       [unlikely to work as you'd need all owners to agree if development _did_       happen], plus mention of "ransom strips" [bought in order to deny access       unless bought back at excessive price].)                     --        J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf               And Jonathan Harker would never have sent all those letters to his       beloved Mina from Transylvania, he'd have texted her instead. "Stuck in       weird castle w guy w big teeth. Missing u. xxxx (-:"       - Alison Graham, RT 2015/11/7-13              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca