From: cl@isbd.net   
      
   Java Jive  wrote:   
   > On 2025-12-05 16:44, croy wrote:   
   > >   
   > > I'm   
   > > assuming that a security hole was plugged, and if that is correct, I like   
   > > it.   
   > I fail to see how this could have plugged any security hole!  Before and   
   > now, in both cases you have to have possession of the phone and the   
   > matching fingerprint/PIN/ugly mug/whatever to log into it, so the new   
   > rigmarole is not discernibly more secure than the old, it's just a   
   > ritual bloody nuisance.   
   >   
   Exactly! If someone has your phone in their hands then all files are   
   accessible, the only possible protection is encryption.   
      
   --   
   Chris Green   
   ·   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)