home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.mobile.android      Discussion about Android-based devices      236,313 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 235,404 of 236,313   
   Alan to Marian   
   Re: Analysis of new EU energy efficiency   
   30 Dec 25 18:06:27   
   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2025-12-30 17:31, Marian wrote:   
   > Tyrone wrote:   
   >>> 4. The analysis of measured battery capacity versus class was one of the   
   >>> more counterintuitive findings. You showed that higher efficiency   
   >>> classes   
   >>> tend to have smaller batteries, which implies that software, silicon,   
   >>> and   
   >>> system-level optimization dominate over raw capacity. This is a valuable   
   >>> correction to the common assumption that larger batteries always   
   >>> correlate   
   >>> with better endurance as the endurance is a function of multiple   
   >>> factors.   
   >>   
   >> And yet you were the ONLY person here making the "common assumption".   
   >> You were   
   >> told multiple times by multiple people that higher efficiency means   
   >> the phone   
   >> can have a smaller - and LIGHTER - battery while maintaining long run   
   >> times. Which makes the phone that much more attractve. You were told   
   >> multiple times   
   >> that "software, silicon, and system-level optimization dominate over raw   
   >> capacity".   
   >> Of course you did not believe us, since we are all just "Stupid Apple   
   >> Trolls".   
   >>  Right?   
   >>   
   >> So can we now assume that you will FINALLY cease your absurd claims that   
   >> "Apple puts crappy batteries in iPhones"?  "The analysis of measured   
   >> battery   
   >> capacity versus class" was only counterintuitive to you.  To everyone   
   >> else it   
   >> makes perfect sense.   
   >   
   > Maybe you misunderstood all the iPhone ever produced before June 20, 2025.   
   >   
   > I've been saying for years that the Apple claim on high efficiency was a   
   > brazen lie & the dismal June 20th EU mandated "B" results proved me right.   
      
   1. a "B" isn't dismal.   
      
   2. Apple clearly explained why they CHOSE to have their phones scored as   
   a "B".   
      
   >   
   > Not a single iPhone prior to the very latest could earn even close to an A.   
   > I knew that would be the case because I understand what Apple products are.   
      
   Like you understood privileged ports and SMB on iOS?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca