Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.mobile.android    |    Discussion about Android-based devices    |    236,147 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 235,753 of 236,147    |
|    Maria Sophia to Chris    |
|    Re: Happy New Year. It's January 1st. I'    |
|    03 Feb 26 16:06:55    |
      From: mariasophia@comprehension.com              I wrote this to Chris on the Windows newsgroup just now, but it covers the       topic of privacy and header privacy in particular, so I think it's apropos.               Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10        Subject: Re: Any point to password protecting the bios if only 3 people in       the household, and 2 know nothing about bioses?        Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 15:58:11 -0500        Message-ID: <10ltnh3$2p6s$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>              Chris wrote:       > I'm not reflecting your ability to explain things. "Maria" is a very well       > known nymshifting troll on the iphone ng.              Hi Chris,              I'm going to try very hard to correct you while being very nice doing it.              There's this 700-year old concept first expressed by Aristotle & Aquinas       but which is most remembered after being formalized by William of Ockham.              Occam's razor says the simplest explanation is usually the best one as long       as it accounts for *all the known facts*. It doesn't mean "pick only one       explanation that fits only one detail and ignore the rest", Chris.              It means the explanation that fits everything is likely most reasonable.       So let's look at all the data, not just one piece of it.              Yes, I change nyms at least once a year. I've said that openly for decades,       and I've always explained why. Basic privacy.              Have I ever not wanted privacy?       Everyone on this newsgroup, for decades, is well aware of that fact, Chris.              But everything else about me stays exactly the same such as my writing       style, my technical depth, my tone, my posting habits, and my long history       of contributing without trolling. In all these decades, nobody has ever       produced a single example of me trolling under any name.              You didn't use the word trolling, but your implication is clear, Chris.       You simply don't like how much I know about Apple products, Chris.       And that's fine. You don't have to like that I understand Apple gear.              But if you apply Occam's razor correctly, the explanation that fits all the       evidence is simply that I'm the same person I've always been, using a fresh       nym at least once each year for privacy. The alternative explanation you       hint at, which is that I'm secretly some unrelated troll, requires you       ignoring decades of consistent behavior and you maliciously inventing       motives that don't match anything I've ever done.              That's why your conclusion doesn't hold up. It's based on one isolated fact       while disregarding the full pattern everyone here has seen for years.                     > He has this obsession on Apple       > "motherships" and how Apple devices won't work without being polled for a       > pw several times a day. Many people have told him that is not reality. He       > refuses to accept it due to his own obtuse experience.              Hi Chris,              Again, I'm going to try very hard to correct you while being nice doing it.              What you said above, is so wrong, that I simply need to point to the full       thread on that very topic because you just "saying" that doesn't do that       which even Apple documentation says it does, doesn't mean that "many people       have told him" means that what you think Apple does is what Apple does.        From: Maria Sophia |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca