From: this@ddress.is.invalid
Maria Sophia wrote:
> Regarding this technical thread about contacts privacy on this newsgroup:
>
> From: Maria Sophia
> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
> Subject: How many apps on your phone have contacts read permission?
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:51:26 -0500
> Message-ID: <10mg98t$pig$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
>
> I have 78 or 79, including system apps that have read permission to my
> contacts, although none of them can get even a single contact from me.
>
> How many do you have?
> ----------------------
>
> This is Frank Slootweg's contribution to this privacy-strategy discussion:
Nope, that was *not* my response to your question ("How many do you
have?"). I answered your question and gave details my apps which have
read permission for contacts.
What you quote (below) is a much later response and *not* related to
your question, but, as evidenced by the attribution, to what Carlos
posted.
Moral: Read for comprehension and do not engage your army of straw
men.
> From: Frank Slootweg
> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
> Subject: Re: How many apps on your phone have contacts read permission?
> Date: 14 Feb 2026 10:38:36 GMT
> Message-ID: <10mpmrf.18m8.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
>
> Carlos E. R. wrote:
> > On 2026-02-13 18:34, Maria Sophia wrote:
> [...]
>
> > That's your claim, and we do not accept it. We are all respectful of
> > other people privacy when using the Android contact app.
>
> I think it's rather disrespectful of 'Arlen' to put the names
> and e-mail addresses of his contacts "on the cloud".
>
> And no 'Arlen', this is not trolling, this is just exposing
> the inconsistency in your argument.
>
> And yes 'Arlen', I've made this argument before and you ignored it
> and silently snipped it. We wonder why.
[...]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
