XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.computer.workshop   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:33:01 -0500, <> wrote:   
      
   >In article <10jo9os$1e9ig$2@dont-email.me>,   
   >recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 1/8/26 05:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 05:22:28 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro   
   >> >  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 13:32:48 -0600, Ken wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >>> No mention of the fact that the dead person was trying to run over   
   >> >>> ICE agents??   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Notice the shot was from an oblique angle. That (as well as the video   
   >> >> itself) shows the shooter was not in the path of the vehicle.   
   >> >   
   >> > Yet he clealy got hit.   
   >>   
   >> Where does the TTP state that an officer should deliberately stand in   
   >> front of an operating vehicle?  Chapter & verse with cite, please.   
   >>   
   >> Putting yourself in harm's way when the TTP doesn't call for that   
   >> doctrine is a standards violation...   
   >>   
   >> ...and escalation to try to cover for your mistake isn't justified.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> -hh   
   >   
   >Ladies and gentleman. We just might have encountered the   
   >dumbest person on the Internet, hh.   
   >   
   >So next time you, hh, are involved in a dangerous   
   >situation requiring split second, life or death decisions,   
   >I sure hope to God that you have your Kindle in your back   
   >pocket so you can look up the rules and regulations for   
   >the incident you are currently involved in.   
   >You'll be dead before your Kindle even boots up.   
   >   
   >You are a total, fucking idiot.   
   >I'm sure you have heard that before though so i cannot   
   >take credit for the determination.   
   >   
      
   Pretty much sums his response perfectly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)