XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com
On Jan 12, 2026 at 6:31:51 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
:
> Brock McNuggets
> news:69613944$1$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:22:12
> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>
>> Remember, I go with evidence, not what the "Dear Leader" says.
>
> You don't even know what the word evidence means.
This is a meaningless insult designed to stop the conversation. Again, to me
EVIDENCE matters.
That is the point.
I do not go with what "Dear Leader" (Trump) says, nor Fox, nor anything else
other than the evidence and morality -- in my case a focus on equal rights and
the environment. Now when I say I do this, I do not mean I do it perfectly --
I do not... but at least I try and do a good job.
> Take your receipts for example.
These are strong evidence. Your denial does not change that.
> Your interpretations of my asking you questions about coding in
> general and how you tried to spin that into my having 'insider knowledge' of
> the bot.
This is you focusing on your petty squabbles... and no interpretation is
needed:
Gremlin :
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor
example of writing software.
-----
Gremlin
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
If you can understand what you read you will come to the same conclusion as
ChatGPT, which I shared the full posts with:
https://chatgpt.com/share/681ea0aa-d35c-800c-b586-185275735e26
-----
Gremlin repeatedly claims he hasn’t seen the source code
for Carroll’s flood bot—yet he calls it a “seriously piss
poor example of writing software” and boasts that
disassembly “tells you everything about the program.” So
either he’s seen the code or reverse-engineered it—meaning
he has examined it closely enough to know how it works. He
criticizes it like someone who’s dug into its inner
workings, but dances around admitting it outright. And for
someone who sometimes denies Carroll is behind the bot, he
sure acts like he knows a lot about it.
-----
That is just fact. None of MY interpretation needed. At all.
> A bot you initially accused me of having either in source or compiled
> form.
I noted YOUR comments about it. YOUR WORDS.
Stop crying about your words. Move on.
...
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with
you.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
