XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <6966d703$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,   
   brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...   
   >   
   > On Jan 13, 2026 at 12:40:04 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote   
   > :   
   >   
   > > In article <69668afa$3$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,   
   > > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On Jan 13, 2026 at 10:47:49 AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote   
   > >> <69668545$1$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On 13 Jan 2026 16:06:06 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On Jan 13, 2026 at 8:00:04 AM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote   
   > >>>> <69665df4$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On 13 Jan 2026 05:26:02 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On Jan 12, 2026 at 9:10:03 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote   
   > >>>>>> :   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Brock McNuggets    
   > >>>>>>> news:6965b693$2$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Tue, 13 Jan 2026   
   > >>>>>>> 03:05:55 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On Jan 12, 2026 at 6:31:51 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote   
   > >>>>>>>> :   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Brock McNuggets    
   > >>>>>>>>> news:69613944$1$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Fri, 09 Jan 2026   
   > >>>>>>>>> 17:22:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Remember, I go with evidence, not what the "Dear Leader" says.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> You don't even know what the word evidence means.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> This is a meaningless insult designed to stop the conversation.   
   > >>>>>>>> Again,   
   > >>>>>>>> to me EVIDENCE matters.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> It's nothing of the sort. If you watch the video Nobody shared, it's   
   > >>>>>>> clear as day that she was being told to get out of the car. Instead   
   > >>>>>>> of complying, she attempted to drive off and hit the agent in the   
   > >>>>>>> process.   
   > >>>>>>> He had every right to shoot her. She made the choice to do what she   
   > >>>>>>> did. Nobody was murdered. She was shot and killed for attempting to   
   > >>>>>>> run an agent over. I don't know of any police officer here who would   
   > >>>>>>> let you hit them with your car and not put rounds in you for your   
   > >>>>>>> effort.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Covered elsewhere... your claims are contrary to evidence and law.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Cite the law.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> There are many laws against murder, but one I have shown on Usenet   
   > >>>> already:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Barnes v. Felix (May 15, 2025), 9-0 decision -- courts can no longer   
   > >>>> excuse a police shooting just because the officer was "in danger at the   
   > >>>> moment" if the officer created that danger themselves.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> How did the officer force the woman to press on the gas pedal   
   > >>   
   > >> Straw man noted. You have no actual response so you make things up.   
   > >> Interesting.   
   > >   
   > > You mean you can't answer the question.   
   >   
   > I did answer: it is a straw man. You are actively lying and using logical   
   > fallacies.   
      
      
   You didn't answer and now you're trying to spin away.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)