Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.advocacy    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    164,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 163,555 of 164,974    |
|    CrudeSausage to DFS    |
|    Re: AI now deeply embedded into Linux ke    |
|    14 Jan 26 17:43:00    |
      From: crude@sausa.ge              On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:36:32 -0500, DFS wrote:              > While Linux bitches bitch and whine about optional AI in Windows, Linux       > kernel developers already rely 100% on AI for a variety of tasks:       >       >       > "As Torvalds said in his OSS Japan keynote, AI has finally reached the       > point where it is genuinely helpful for Linux maintainers, rather than       > just hype around code generation. He emphasized that his interest lies       > in AI systems that pre-screen patches and merges, surfacing issues       > before they reach his inbox, rather than in tools that attempt to write       > complex kernel code outright. AI is not ready for that yet."       >       > ...       >       > Levin also said a patch merged for Linux 6.15, credited to him but       > entirely generated by AI, with changelog and tests included. The patch,       > a small but non-trivial hash-table change, demonstrated, in his view,       > what AI does well: narrowly scoped, mechanical transformations in which       > the model can reason about bit-fields."       >       >       > https://www.zdnet.com/article/ai-is-part-of-linux-plumbing-developers/       >       >       > Say it ain't so!       >       > Let the excuse-making commence.              You're not wrong. Nevertheless, AI in Windows is offered in places where       it does not benefit the user in the least, in places where privacy should       be the main priority and through hardware nobody was looking to have (the       NPU). Additionally, Microsoft has already shown that it has no interest       whatsoever in allowing us to preserve our privacy in their disrespect of       our settings for Windows itself (with optional data being sent to them       regardless of what we configured) and in reinstalling software the user       had consciously uninstalled because it was a privacy threat. Whether AI is       useful or not was not the argument, it should have been whether users       should be forced to swallow it.                            --       CrudeSausage       John 14:6       Pop_OS!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca