XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article ,   
   joelcrump@gmail.com says...   
   >   
   > On 1/15/26 12:38 PM, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:59:07 -0500, "Joel W. Crump"   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >> On 1/15/26 9:03 AM, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <%w4aR.334$iu59.76@fx08.iad>,   
   > >>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...   
   > >>>> On 1/14/26 10:00 PM, rbowman wrote:   
   > >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:49:23 -0500, Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> What ICE is doing is intruding on states' sovereignty and is a crime   
   > >>>>>> against humanity.  Arresting and murdering protesters means we're at   
   > >>>>>> war.  If you want war, admit it.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States'_rights   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> I'm all for states' rights but you had better consider the   
   consequences.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Well I'm not radically for states' rights if it means that a state can   
   > >>>> do anything it wants to its citizens, or something, clearly there are   
   > >>>> national standards and laws that apply throughout the states, but   
   > >>>> states' rights never stopped being important just because they were   
   > >>>> misused or perceived as being misused, if we're going to have   
   > >>>> sovereignty for the states then it should mean something.  The concept   
   > >>>> of returning abortion law to the states didn't seem to bother these   
   > >>>> Trump voters, even though it's so predictably and obviously created a   
   > >>>> disaster, but a sanctuary city or state has to deal with this   
   > >>>> administration turning their streets into a war zone with the federal   
   > >>>> government being the invader.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> That's *definitely* where I start taking "states' rights" pretty   
   > >>>> seriously.  Particularly when government policy created the "problem" of   
   > >>>> illegal immigration, they didn't create a system for legal immigration   
   > >>>> that could cover our needs, they didn't do anything to stop it until   
   > >>>> suddenly Trump gets a second term and these loons thinking this   
   > >>>> deportation policy can or should work are the ones with "Trump   
   > >>>> Derangement Syndrome", they're so deranged to follow him that he could   
   > >>>> do something so profoundly moronic and incredibly difficult/impossible   
   > >>>> and they do nothing but defend things like ICE shooting people.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Shot another POS last night. FAFO numbskull.   
   > >>   
   > >> I'm sure Tyler Robinson felt that Charlie Kirk fucked around and found   
   > >> out, too, does that make what he did just fine?  Is that how a healthy   
   > >> society would function?  Of course not, you just want to believe despite   
   > >> all the evidence you're dead wrong that your side can take on anything.   
   > >> You're going to regret it, if it comes to war.   
   > >   
   > >  Big words from a little girly man.   
   >   
   >   
   > If a moron like you calls me that because I take a moral stand against   
   > authoritarian lawlessness, I can live with it.   
      
   You don't have any choice. There's nothing you could do   
   anyway.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)