XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-25 06:13, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   > On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 00:50:09 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:   
   >   
   >> CrudeSausage  wrote at 16:37 this Friday (GMT):   
   >>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:10:07 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> CrudeSausage  wrote at 23:14 this Tuesday (GMT):   
   >>>>> On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:10:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> CrudeSausage  wrote at 17:47 this Tuesday (GMT):   
   >>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:39:27 +0000, vallor wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So say you side-load a Mac app.  You usually get a .dmg which you   
   >>>>>>>> mount,   
   >>>>>>>> then drag the app folder on top of the handy alias for the system   
   >>>>>>>> app folders.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That's fine, but what if you want to uninstall?  There doesn't   
   >>>>>>>> seem to be much of a package manager involved.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> But on Linux, apps are in packages that are tracked by the system.   
   >>>>>>>> When you uninstall an app on Linux, the default is to take away   
   >>>>>>>> the app without touching config files -- but with the apt/dpkg   
   >>>>>>>> "purge" option, the package system will clean out the config   
   >>>>>>>> files, too.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> (Not user dot-files though, those are yours to keep.)   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Generally, even after I purge an application in Linux, its settings   
   >>>>>>> remain. You have to manually delete the folder in .config the same   
   >>>>>>> way you would in any other operating system. Of course, it's a lot   
   >>>>>>> easier to do on Linux since those folders are exactly where you   
   >>>>>>> would expect them to be, not lost in the registry or some obscure   
   >>>>>>> folder.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Unfortunately, theres a LOT of applications that dump everything in   
   >>>>>> the home folder instead of just using the prebuilt stuff. Still not   
   >>>>>> HARD to find, but tis very annoying.   
   >>>>>> My person home folder has over 200 folders.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't have that many, but at least I know that the ones I do have   
   >>>>> were created by me. I never found anything as annoying as every   
   >>>>> Windows program deciding that it would create a folder for itself in   
   >>>>> your "My Documents" folder. My understanding was that this was   
   >>>>> supposed to be a personal folder; why programs were doing anything in   
   >>>>> there was beyond me. It bothered me enough that I made an actual   
   >>>>> "Personal" folder inside of "My Documents" just to avoid the garbage.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> A lot of programs, especially ones originally written for Windows,   
   >>>> tend to do that, at least for me.   
   >>>   
   >>> It's a common behaviour, and one that annoyed me to no end. The very   
   >>> fact that the folder is called "_My_ Documents" should mean that   
   >>> third-party applications would stay out of it. There should be a   
   >>> directory in which applications can create a subdirectory, not   
   >>> interfere with the user's own folders.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I think %appdata% was sorta supposed to be that, but I guess devs   
   >> figured it was too scary for the end user so they use the Docs folder.   
   >   
   > The question is: why do the developers believe it is necessary for users   
   > to have access to the application data in the first place?   
   What a very odd question for a proponent of Linux and openness to be asking.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)