From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 13:30:15 -0500, DFS wrote:   
      
   > On 1/26/2026 12:14 PM, Stallman Lackey Larry Piet (aka Farley Flud)   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >> Indeed, the free computing world loves Dr. Richard M. Stallman and   
   >> everyone wants to hear his masterful judgments.   
   >   
   >   
   > Like this one?   
   >   
   > "When making pornography involves real abuse of real children, those who   
   > distribute it under a business relationship with the abusers arguably   
   > participate in the abuse. They could be prosecuted for doing so.   
   > However, that does not excuse censorship. No matter how disgusting   
   > published works might be, censorship is more disgusting."   
   >   
   > https://stallman.org/archives/2011-jan-apr.html   
   >   
   >   
   > Thus, Idiot Feeb, if you were to (shudder) procreate and your 8-year-old   
   > child was kidnapped and forced to suck a dick while being anally raped   
   > on video and that video made it onto the Internet, Stinkmeister Stallman   
   > believes the video shouldn't be taken down and destroyed because that   
   > would be "censorship".   
   >   
   > Congrats on your support of the mentally ill, former NAMBLA ally, and   
   > detestable pig.   
   >   
   > I say 'former NAMBLA ally' because he previously stated he was   
   > "skeptical of the harm of voluntarily (sic) pedophilia.", which is just   
   > what NAMBLA sickos love to hear.  Stallman now disclaims that   
   > skepticism.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >> Hail GNU and the FSF!  Hail Stallman!   
   >   
   > In all seriousness:   
   >   
   > Screw GuhNoo Fell the GPL Fuck the FSF Jail Stallman   
      
   You've made this point before. One would have to argue that it would be   
   necessary for the authorities to continue to have access to the video   
   evidence of a crime to prosecute the offenders, but I can't imagine why   
   such content would be available to the public. Censorship here is   
   absolutely necessary. I would go farther and say that anyone broadcasting   
   to the public, whether through a network or through cable, should also be   
   severely reprimanded for showing content that goes against the moral code   
   of a society.   
      
   While I am against censorship when it comes to one person speaking to   
   another, I don't believe that things like nudity and offensive language   
   should be a part of what the public consumes anymore. We've gone too far   
   in one direction for there to even be any hope of decency or morality   
   being the norm in society. The public needs to be served clean content,   
   regardless of whether it is boring or not, and anyone peddling garbage   
   like rap or pornography needs to see their business bankrupted. If the   
   result is that people listen to less music, watch less television and   
   spend more time outside, so be it.   
      
      
      
   --   
   CrudeSausage   
   John 14:6   
   Isaiah 48:16   
   Pop_OS!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)