Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.advocacy    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    164,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 163,887 of 164,974    |
|    rbowman to CrudeSausage    |
|    Re: Glibc-2.43 Released    |
|    26 Jan 26 20:32:53    |
      From: bowman@montana.com              On 26 Jan 2026 02:38:18 GMT, CrudeSausage wrote:              > On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 19:08:50 -0500, DFS wrote:       >       >> On 1/25/2026 10:06 AM, Stallman Lackey Larry Piet (aka Farley Flud)       >> wrote:       >>       >>       >>> the great Dr. Richard M. Stallman       >>       >> He's NOT great, and he's NOT a Doctor.       >       > He's definitely not a doctor, but he did get an honourary doctorate. As       > for him being great or not, I will submit a question: would the world of       > technology naturally gravitate toward producing open-source software had       > it not been for Richard Stallman. There is reason to believe that       > Shareware would have existed even if GNU hadn't, but I doubt that would       > have resulted in a free operating system with its free set of       > applications, and the dogma that software should strive to open up its       > code.              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cathedral_and_the_Bazaar              In Stallman's world permissive licenses would not exit. Would Linux have       come about under a Zero-Clause BSD licese or did it need Rabbi Stallman       and his moral legalisms?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca