home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.linux.advocacy      Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate      164,974 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 163,893 of 164,974   
   Paul to Frank Slootweg   
   Re: Windows fans: tell me where the narr   
   26 Jan 26 16:45:52   
   
   XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: nospam@needed.invalid   
      
   On Mon, 1/26/2026 10:11 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:   
   > chrisv  wrote:   
   >> Frank Slootweg wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> CrudeSausage  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You're going to tell me that you've never had an update take hours to   
   >>>> complete?   
   >>>   
   >>>  Indeed, I never had that. We're talking Windows 11 here, which mostly   
   >>> uses modern hardware (because of TPM and stuff) and probably SSDs.   
   >>   
   >> I've not seen it on Win11, but I know that earlier versions (can't   
   >> remember if it was 7 or 10 or both) had a problem that could cause   
   >> updates to take hours.  There were a couple of individual updates that   
   >> could be done first, to "fix" this problem.   
   >   
   >   Yes, a few hours (two?) in the *past*, on older hardware ('small' RAM,   
   > no SSD), but most of that was *online* time, i.e. the system was still   
   > up, but 'just' busy'. But a quick perusal of the video transcript, talks   
   > about 7 hours of *offline* time (i.e. restarting/rebooting). *If* that   
   > ever happened on a modern, sufficiently specced system, then something   
   > was seriously wrong and that's by no means typical. Trying to spread it   
   > as typical/common is just FUD, click-bait, etc..   
   >   
      
   Typically when that happens, it's because the offline update   
   phase is "parked". I find that the only stimulus that makes any   
   difference, is unplugging the network cable. And it doesn't   
   happen instantly either. It might take 30 seconds before   
   you notice a few blinks of the disk light.   
      
   And while this is happening, you have the juggling balls on the screen.   
      
   Whether it is a deadlock in some code, or an intentional   
   timer-based activity, I don't really know of good ways to check.   
   While you can start collecting a trace with Process Monitor,   
   and collect a shutdown trace and a boot trace, I don't know   
   what you could expect to find in there. The ETW subsystem could   
   be shut down, at the point where the machine is not making   
   forward progress on the Update queued.   
      
      Paul   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca