From: ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-26, CrudeSausage  wrote:   
   > On 26 Jan 2026 15:54:46 GMT, Nobody wrote:   
   >   
   >> Brock McNuggets  wrote in   
   >> news:6976d601$2$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Jan 25, 2026 at 7:38:18 PM MST, "CrudeSausage" wrote   
   >>> <6976d39a$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 19:08:50 -0500, DFS wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 1/25/2026 10:06 AM, Stallman Lackey Larry Piet (aka Farley Flud)   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> the great Dr. Richard M. Stallman   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> He's NOT great, and he's NOT a Doctor.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> He's definitely not a doctor, but he did get an honourary doctorate.   
   >>>> As for him being great or not, I will submit a question: would the   
   >>>> world of technology naturally gravitate toward producing open-source   
   >>>> software had it not been for Richard Stallman. There is reason to   
   >>>> believe that Shareware would have existed even if GNU hadn't, but I   
   >>>> doubt that would have resulted in a free operating system with its   
   >>>> free set of applications, and the dogma that software should strive to   
   >>>> open up its code.   
   >>>   
   >>> You can grant Stallman influence without turning it into sainthood.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, he mattered early: the GPL and copyleft accelerated one path to a   
   >>> free OS stack. But the larger trend toward open source was already   
   >>> underway via Unix culture, academia, BSD, the internet, and later   
   >>> Linux, Apache, Git, etc. The ecosystem converged on open source because   
   >>> it works, not because FSF dogma won.   
   >>>   
   >>> And "greatness" is not just being early. Stallman repeatedly argued for   
   >>> legalizing or normalizing pedophilia, bestiality, and necrophilia,   
   >>> and minimized harm to children -– not as one-offs, but consistently   
   >>> over decades. You can credit the license without granting the man moral   
   >>> authority.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> Why did you leave incest out of your list of Stallman's sick ideas?   
   >> It was in your last message Michael.   
   >> Is it because in the past you have supported incest?   
   >   
   > I think he might be the product of incest. It is a serious problem in the   
   > muhammedan community as well as with the Jews. They just can't get enough   
   > of that sweet, sweet cousin vagina.   
   >   
   >< snip >   
      
   The head Rothschild family (Jacob) who recently died mentioned in a speech   
   (a few years ago) how the Rothschilds weren't allowed to marry outside of   
   the family. That way the money stayed in the family. He was trying to make a   
   joke out of it, but it wasn't very funny. (Although I think the people   
   listening to him laughed at it.)   
      
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhaihcUNAnE   
   (at the 6:55 mark)   
      
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f8glBueZRE   
   (more on this)   
      
   --   
   "Not just insane... Trump insane."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)