From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 1/27/26 08:41, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   > On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 06:41:37 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-20, CrudeSausage  wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 02:58:08 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-19, CrudeSausage  wrote:   
   >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 02:27:55 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-19, chrisv  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> RonB wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> rbowman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> RonB wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> He's not talking about buying it, he's talking about stealing   
   >>>>>>>>>> it.   
   >>>>>>>>>> He wants it for its natural resources, which I'm guessing is why   
   >>>>>>>>>> Denmark still wants it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I don't know why he's so intent but Denmark has never done   
   >>>>>>>>> anything with Greenland except sink money into supporting the   
   >>>>>>>>> natives.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So what? Does that give Trump the "right" to steal it? The greedy   
   >>>>>>>> bastard.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Trump is out of control, no doubt.  I support the ICE actions, but   
   >>>>>>> the Greenland business is CRAZY.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I support ICE actions also. But I don't support murdering an unarmed   
   >>>>>> woman.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> She and her repulsive "wife" were asking for it. Nobody asked them to   
   >>>>> block traffic, nobody asked them to ignore orders to move, nobody   
   >>>>> asked the victim to block ICE vehicles when they tried to pass,   
   >>>>> nobody asked her "wife" to antagonize an ICE agent and nobody asked   
   >>>>> her to drive off when she was ordered to get out of the car. She   
   >>>>> wanted trouble, she got it. She is not the innocent victim everyone   
   >>>>> is painting her as being.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes, she was a ring-tailed bitch. But you don't murder disorderly   
   >>>> people because you're frustrated with them. You arrest them and try   
   >>>> them in a court of law. There's no excuse for this murder. Period.   
   >>>> Apparently this particular ICE agent had gotten into a fight a month   
   >>>> earlier with another ICE agent. These are the kind of people who   
   >>>> shouldn't be hired for police work.   
   >>>   
   >>> She was asked to step out of the car and drove off instead, hitting an   
   >>> ICE agent right in front of her. Had she cooperated with the agents,   
   >>> she'd be alive today. Instead, she attempted to murder someone whether   
   >>> accidentally or intentionally. He felt threatened, and he shot. I would   
   >>> not have expected him or anyone else to do anything else. The fact that   
   >>> the media is trying to paint him as an uncontrollable, angry person   
   >>> just reminds me that they are retarded demons who will stoop to any   
   >>> level to defend their own demons.   
   >>   
   >> The thug who shot her had *already moved out the way* of the car before   
   >> he shot her in the head. He shot her as the car was *passing him.*   
   >> Murder, no other word for it. He was out of control. Someone did a   
   >> piss-poor job of profiling him before hiring him for the job. Someone   
   >> mentioned that he had been in a fight with another ICE agent just a   
   >> month earlier. A trigger happy asshole.   
   >   
   > The facts:   
   >   
   > - She intentionally parked her car in the middle of the road to impede   
   > ICE's work.   
   > - Her wife was antagonizing the ICE agents as she did so.   
   > - She consistently blocked passing ICE vehicles.   
   > - She refused to get out of the way when ordered to do so.   
   > - She refused to get out of the car when ordered to do so.   
   > - She attempted to flee the scene of her crime after being asked to exit   
   > her vehicle.   
   > - In attempting to flee, she drove into an officer who shot her through   
   > her windshield from the front and again from the side.   
   >   
   > Everything else is propaganda.   
      
   Not really:  there's also the Use of Force Policies for DOJ, CBP, & DHS   
   which have set very specific parameters for when it is legal for an   
   officer to use lethal force.   
      
   In these, it specifically excludes shooting at a car where the   
   alternative is to step aside.  Similar documents specifically identify   
   standing in front of a car to try to contrive 'peril' as disallowed.   
      
   > In fact, military experts have already been   
   > discussing how these tactics are the same as were generally being used by   
   > Communists in other countries to topple their governments.   
      
   Oh?  Got the cite for that?  I'd like to read what my peers are saying.   
      
   > Even the media   
   > is complicit. I have nothing else to say in this matter and I have no   
   > sympathy for her or for the other clown who decided to go into the middle   
   > of the street and impede ICE's work when he was told to stay on the   
   > sidewalk. You're free to believe their lies and manipulation, but I won't.   
      
   Well, as an instructor of some of the stuff that ICE is using, its been   
   hard for me to not notice a lot of use violations.  Sure, there's always   
     a "few, isolated", but this has been far too frequent to have been   
   inadvertent & accidental so it is hard for me to not conclude that its   
   not deliberate.   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)