Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.advocacy    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    165,424 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 163,938 of 165,424    |
|    CrudeSausage to -hh    |
|    Re: Gentoo Linux: $10K community donatio    |
|    27 Jan 26 20:37:36    |
      From: crude@sausa.ge              On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:35:54 -0500, -hh wrote:              > On 1/26/26 19:43, CrudeSausage wrote:       >> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 22:44:59 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>       >>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:57:02 -0500, DFS wrote:       >>>       >>>> On 1/26/2026 3:30 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> And yet they can produce a higher-quality distribution than       >>>>> Microsoft can manage with an operating budget several orders of       >>>>> magniture greater.       >>>>       >>>> You know better than that.       >>>       >>> All I know is, one outfit has done, not one, but *two* “emergency”       >>> patches for serious problems with this month’s update, while the other       >>> has not.       >>       >> Like I've said before, it's just a matter of time before DFS is       >> affected by one of these updates and potentially loses all his previous       >> Excel files. When his computer become unbootable or he loses tons of       >> data for no good reason, he might realize that Linux is not so bad.       >       >       > Well, MS has been known to abandon their own MS-Office formats, but this       > does raise an interesting question on if they're unique in doing this.       >       > For example, I can recall past advocacy claims about how one doesn't       > need to pay for MS-Office because their files are compatible in some of       > the FOSS "Office" products. Was this a correct & true statement?       >       > FWIW, I'm guessing Open Office and/or Libre Office were likely examples.       >       > Because if that is so...       >       > ...doesn't this together then imply that the issue of MS file format       > abandonment is solved by simply using a current copy of OO/LO to open       > those ancient formats, because they never abandoned their compatibility?       >       > FWIW, I have an ancient PowerPoint that I've kept for years, as I'd like       > to recover to its original format: it is available as a test case.              For me, the only way to make sure that a document written in a format does       not eventually get lost or suffer from incompatibility is to use a format       which is by default open, with OpenDocument being the only one which is       truly open.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca