From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 23:42:34 -0500, DFS wrote:   
      
   > On 1/26/2026 1:37 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 13:30:15 -0500, DFS wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 1/26/2026 12:14 PM, Stallman Lackey Larry Piet (aka Farley Flud)   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Indeed, the free computing world loves Dr. Richard M. Stallman and   
   >>>> everyone wants to hear his masterful judgments.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Like this one?   
   >>>   
   >>> "When making pornography involves real abuse of real children, those   
   >>> who distribute it under a business relationship with the abusers   
   >>> arguably participate in the abuse. They could be prosecuted for doing   
   >>> so. However, that does not excuse censorship. No matter how disgusting   
   >>> published works might be, censorship is more disgusting."   
   >>>   
   >>> https://stallman.org/archives/2011-jan-apr.html   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Thus, Idiot Feeb, if you were to (shudder) procreate and your   
   >>> 8-year-old child was kidnapped and forced to suck a dick while being   
   >>> anally raped on video and that video made it onto the Internet,   
   >>> Stinkmeister Stallman believes the video shouldn't be taken down and   
   >>> destroyed because that would be "censorship".   
   >>>   
   >>> Congrats on your support of the mentally ill, former NAMBLA ally, and   
   >>> detestable pig.   
   >>>   
   >>> I say 'former NAMBLA ally' because he previously stated he was   
   >>> "skeptical of the harm of voluntarily (sic) pedophilia.", which is   
   >>> just what NAMBLA sickos love to hear.  Stallman now disclaims that   
   >>> skepticism.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Hail GNU and the FSF!  Hail Stallman!   
   >>>   
   >>> In all seriousness:   
   >>>   
   >>> Screw GuhNoo Fell the GPL Fuck the FSF Jail Stallman   
   >>   
   >> You've made this point before.   
   >   
   >   
   > I'll make it at least until that lascivious creep is 6 feet under, or he   
   > renounces all the stupid and grotesque beliefs he's spouted for decades.   
      
   He's not going to be with us much longer, and since he's denied Christ his   
   entire life, I imagine he won't like his destination.   
      
   On the bright side, he'll get lots of warm weather.   
      
   >> One would have to argue that it would be necessary for the authorities   
   >> to continue to have access to the video evidence of a crime to   
   >> prosecute the offenders, but I can't imagine why such content would be   
   >> available to the public.   
   >   
   > It's out there, as proven by the continual busts of creeps possessing   
   > child porn.   
      
   I notice that the people caught possessing this stuff are often people who   
   show up at protests, telling us about how evil the government is.   
      
   >> Censorship here is absolutely necessary. I would go farther and say   
   >> that anyone broadcasting to the public, whether through a network or   
   >> through cable, should also be severely reprimanded for showing content   
   >> that goes against the moral code of a society.  While I am against   
   >> censorship when it comes to one person speaking to another, I don't   
   >> believe that things like nudity and offensive language should be a part   
   >> of what the public consumes anymore.   
   >>   
   >> We've gone too far in one direction for there to even be any hope of   
   >> decency or morality being the norm in society. The public needs to be   
   >> served clean content,   
   >> regardless of whether it is boring or not, and anyone peddling garbage   
   >> like rap or pornography needs to see their business bankrupted. If the   
   >> result is that people listen to less music, watch less television and   
   >> spend more time outside, so be it.   
   >   
   >   
   > I'm much more libertarian on all those issues.   
   >   
   > * negroes should be free to debase themselves on TV and in movies and   
   >    music   
      
   Sure, but they shouldn't be given a platform that is in any way sponsored   
   by taxpayer money. Let them broadcast their garbage on low-wattage UHF   
   stations in their cities; networks shouldn't humour them in any way.   
      
   > * trashy reality TV is a good outlet for some people, which is why   
   >    'Jersey Shore' was so popular.  I never watched one episode, but I do   
   >    like 'Below Deck' and 'Shipping Wars'.   
      
   It gives people a terrible example to follow and should be banned from   
   television. I've had students in the past tell me that they want to be   
   like the vapid morons they saw on such reality shows.   
      
   > * I like porn a lot, though the jury's out on the effect of it on the   
   >    mentality and self-esteem of the actors (females especially)   
      
   And it is a sin which will corrupt your soul in every way. If you're not   
   spiritual, then you know that it will at least cause you to see women as   
   objects rather than people, and that it will lower your sensitivity,   
   requiring much more to get you to perform your sexual duty. If you are   
   spiritual, then it is the kind of sinful behaviour which will cause you to   
   be rejected by God.   
      
   > * Cursing I can take or leave.  On the Dexter TV series, one of the main   
   >    characters slings the f-word around a lot.  It does get old.   
      
   That's part of why I couldn't watch Casino with De Niro and Pesci. It was   
   constant. I managed to get through it, but even as a teenager I thought it   
   was much. I try to avoid movies or music that curse nowadays. In fact, I   
   cancelled cable partly to get away from such content. I only subscribe to   
   a sports channel to get my Montreal Canadiens games.   
      
   > * I like sex and violence and killing (especially revenge killing) in   
   >    movies.  Remember 'A History of Violence'?  He killed 8 people   
   >    closeup.  Great stuff!   
      
   I recall watching the movie but don't remember much of it. That's part of   
   the problem with such movies: they lack substance and become forgettable.   
   Gladiator had violence too, but at least it had a story.   
      
   > It's very important to allow freedom of expression and speech, unless   
   > you're calling for physical violation of others.   
      
   I was very much for freedom of expression, but I'm admittedly lowering my   
   support for allowing broadcasters to put such stuff in any form of media.   
   Blacks are already a lost race as a result of their consumption of this   
   stuff, and even the smarter races have become increasingly unproductive   
   and immoral because of it. It's time for a proper reset through a return   
   to morality.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)