Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.advocacy    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    164,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 163,993 of 164,974    |
|    CrudeSausage to Chris Ahlstrom    |
|    Re: Gentoo Linux: $10K community donatio    |
|    28 Jan 26 15:22:48    |
      From: crude@sausa.ge              On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 07:12:43 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:              > rbowman wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:       >       >> On 27 Jan 2026 22:24:44 GMT, CrudeSausage wrote:       >>       >>> Actually, I always wondered whether it was possible to upgrade Windows       >>> 3.0 to 3.1 for free, or whether you had to buy an entirely new       >>> product.       >>> I don't think I ever came across a 3.0 to 3.1 upgrade pack anywhere at       >>> the time.       >>       >> I can't address 3.0 to 3.1. I updated to Windows for Workgroup 3.11       >> using the install media included in the MSDN subscription. At the time       >> you got a binder full of CDs, essentially isos for many different       >> language versions.       >>       >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Developer_Network       >>       >> The changes over the years is interesting. In the early '90s MSDN was       >> more or less a Compuserve forum, with Compuserve being one of the more       >> expensive options. A MSDN subscription was pricey. As late as Visual       >> Studio 6.0 it was almost a requirement to do any serious development.       >> 'Academic' versions of VS were available for $100 USD to suck in the       >> college kids but they were crippled.       >>       >> As the years went on more 'community' or 'express' versions of VS       >> became available and offered almost everything the Enterprise edition       >> had. Documentation became more accessible up to the current https://       >> learn.microsoft.com/en-us/.       >>       >> I don't know if the Microsoft Phone / RT experience was the watershed       >> but MS over the years decided developers were the lifeblood that kept       >> the OS going rather than another revenue stream to be sucked dry.       >       > Developers!       > Developers!       > Developers!       >       > Developers!       > Developers!       > Developers!              My biggest question about that video of him screaming that was why he was       so willing to go out on stage with such obvious pit stains. Seriously,       have a little bit of pride.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca