Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.advocacy    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    164,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 164,015 of 164,974    |
|    Alan to Joel W. Crump    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_AirTag_2_vs_AirTag=3A_He    |
|    28 Jan 26 14:55:54    |
      XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.computer.workshop       From: nuh-uh@nope.com              On 2026-01-28 14:50, Joel W. Crump wrote:       > On 1/28/26 5:41 PM, Alan wrote:       >       >>>>> https://9to5mac.com/2026/01/27/airtag-2-vs-airtag-heres-everything-       >>>>> new/       >>>>>       >>>>> "With AirTag 2, Apple has added a second-generation Ultra Wideband       >>>>> chip that makes Precision Finding available from up to 1.5x farther       >>>>> away than what the first AirTag offered. Make sure you have an       >>>>> iPhone that supports the extended range."       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> So, Alan, since you paid so much for your MacBook, how does it feel       >>>>> now to see that extra cash having gone to such great use by Apple?       >>>       >>>> What does the one have to do with the other?       >>>>       >>>> Apple is a BUSINESS.       >>>>       >>>> Their raison d'etre is to produce PRODUCTS and SERVICES that people       >>>> want to USE.       >>>>       >>>> I bought a MacBook, because Macs have worked well for me for nearly       >>>> 40 years.       >>>>       >>>> I also have purchased AirTags.       >>>>       >>>> So what?       >>>>       >>>> What exactly is wrong with a company putting money it makes back       >>>> into researching, developing, and eventually selling improved products?       >>>       >>> It's actually not so wrong but Apple so blatantly works for bourgeois       >>> first worlders, with what they offer, the iPhone and iPad are       >>> actually pretty decent though, not that I would buy them, but even       >>> though Samsung does have a bourgeois department they also have a       >>> dedication to offering the best alternative to the iPhone. It's       >>> simply a better business to patronize, for such an essential possession.       >>       >> I always love the way you have to immediately pivot away from the       >> arguments they just made.       >       >       > I didn't do that.              Yes. You did.              Your argument was that I (and by extension) others should judge Apple       harshly for making a profit YOU consider excessive and then using some       of that profit to improve another product...              ...which is complete and utter bullshit.              >       >       >> And your penchant for using emotionally charged words (bourgeois).       >>       >> The simple fact is that Apple's customer loyalty is fantastic.       >>       >> You don't get that unless you produce products that those customers       >> VALUE.       >>       >> What makes Samsung a "better business patronize" for a smartphone?       >>       >> Would it be there very recent "promise" to provide support for longer?       >>       >> If they really were a "better business patronize"...       >>       >> ...wouldn't that have already been true?       >       >       > My Galaxy S21 still performs as well as it did when I got it. It       > surprises me how many people upgrade frequently.       OK... ...so? When did you actually get it?              My iPhone 16 "still performs as well as it did when I got it".              Prove that your S21 is any better at this than a contemporaneous iPhone.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca