XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nobody@haph.org   
      
   Alan  news:10l60ot$1urjh$2@dont-email.me Sun, 25 Jan 2026   
   21:08:45 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:   
      
   >> Usually. Sometimes the NAND dies on it's own, other times the power   
   >> control IC is responsible for the failure. These aren't the only ways   
   >> this result can happen though. Apple has all kinds of ... interesting   
   >> little circuit designs under the hood that can fail in spectacularly   
   >> catastrophic ways. I don't know what their QC focuses on as much, but,   
   >> I'm reasonably certain it's not internal circuit design or layout. I   
   >> don't think they care much about that as long as it works - going by   
   >> some of the things I've seen.   
      
   > Yeah... ...you keep saying this, but you've yet to back it up.   
      
   I've provided Louis Rossman video links as well as google search query and   
   the results. I have certainly backed up my statements. Your intentional   
   efforts to ignore all? of it doesn't change anything.   
      
   I provided this link previously (which also supports what I've written)   
   https://discussions.apple.com/thread/254792933?sortBy=rank   
      
   These videos also backs up what I've been writing about and goes into   
   greater detail.   
      
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYG4VMqatEY   
      
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cNg_ifibCQ   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?   
   Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent   
   Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?   
   Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)