home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.linux.advocacy      Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate      164,974 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 164,562 of 164,974   
   -hh to -hh   
   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_AirTag_2_vs_AirTag=3A_He   
   10 Feb 26 09:44:13   
   
   XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.computer.workshop   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 2/9/26 16:19, -hh wrote:   
   > On 2/9/26 14:22, Alan wrote:   
   >> On 2026-02-02 10:28, -hh wrote:   
   >>> On 1/31/26 18:10, pothead wrote:   
   >>>> On 2026-01-30, -hh  wrote:   
   >>>>> On 1/29/26 18:23, pothead wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2026-01-29, -hh  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> ...>>> ...   
   >>>>>> Yea, and where are you going to find a battery when your luggage   
   >>>>>> is in pengo pengo?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Pack a spare battery just in case you forgot to check pre-trip.  BTDT.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> An option.   
   >>>> But then there is battery swelling to deal with.   
   >>>   
   >>> Risks are never zero, but you're misapplying the swelling risks of   
   >>> rechargeable lithium batteries to a non-rechargeable lithium battery   
   >>> chemistry, since the former has many cycles and the latter only ever   
   >>> has one (1) cycle.  Main factor increasing the chemical off-gassing   
   >>> risk is an environment where temperatures exceed 45C (115F), but this   
   >>> applies for both battery types.   
   >>   
   >> And will you look at that, H: it's been an entire week and PH hasn't   
   >> had a thing to say.   
   >   
   > Gosh, how about that!   
   >   
   > Maybe Pothole is still busy trying to locate the skanky smell in their   
   > car, which on another thread they were trying to blame on NYC's mayor   
   > for the trash collection delays after their recent big snowstorm...   
   >   
   > ...while forgetting checking weather records is easy.  For there's not   
   > been a day since the storm where the temperature has gotten above 40F to   
   > start to de-thaw.  And Manhattan yesterday was once again well below   
   > average, at a Lo/High of +3F/+17F (-16C/-8C).   
      
   FWIW, I noticed a ChatGPT method of analysis.  Applied to this thread,   
   it provided:   
      
   [quote]   
      
   1. Psychological profile of the author (“pothead”)   
      
   Communication style   
      
   Argumentative but low-investment: frequent dismissals (“Yawn.”, “Easy   
   peasy.”) instead of engagement with substance.   
      
   Uses assertion and repetition rather than evidence; relies on confidence   
   signaling rather than data.   
      
   Reacts defensively when corrected, reframing factual corrections as   
   personal attacks (“went bonkers,” “minutia rabbit hole”).   
      
   Cognitive patterns   
      
   Confirmation bias: Selectively accepts claims that support prior   
   purchase decisions; discounts counter-evidence as irrelevant or nitpicking.   
      
   Motivated reasoning: Shifts criteria when a claim is challenged (e.g.,   
   form factor → warranty → eco-friendliness).   
      
   Category confusion: Repeatedly conflates different battery chemistries   
   and failure modes while asserting certainty.   
      
   Anecdotal reasoning: Personal convenience and imagined scenarios   
   outweigh incidence rates, lifecycle costs, or engineering tradeoffs.   
      
   Emotional drivers   
      
   Mild brand defensiveness and sunk-cost protection.   
      
   Perceived status threat: corrections are interpreted as social dominance   
   rather than technical clarification.   
   Escalation through tone rather than facts once cornered.   
      
   Overall   
      
   The author is not irrational, but is argument-resistant. They appear   
   more interested in validating a personal choice than in comparing   
   products on consistent criteria.   
      
   2. Fact and logic check of key claims   
      
   Battery swelling risk   
      
   ❌ Incorrect framing. The author repeatedly implies CR2032 disposables   
   pose greater swelling/leak risk than sealed rechargeables.   
   ✔️ Correct correction: Rechargeable lithium-ion/polymer cells have   
   higher swelling incidence over time due to cycling and calendar aging.   
   ❌ “No separate battery = no swelling risk” is false.   
   Maintenance   
   ❌ Claim that rechargeables require less maintenance is logically backwards.   
   ✔️ Replaceable coin cells force maintenance at long intervals;   
   rechargeables require frequent access and recharging.   
      
   Warranty   
      
   ❌ “Lifetime warranty” treated as a concrete guarantee without evidence.   
   ✔️ Skepticism is justified: company age (~2 years), undefined   
   “lifetime,” no bonding or escrow.   
   ❌ Comparing “lifetime” vs “1-year” without enforcement history is not   
   meaningful.   
      
   Cost analysis   
      
   ❌ Dismissal of ROI as “minutia” ignores a ~70% lifecycle cost delta.   
   ✔️ Airtag pricing and break-even calculations are internally consistent   
   and conservative.   
      
   Eco-friendliness   
      
   ❌ Claim that sealed rechargeable is more eco-friendly is unsubstantiated.   
   ✔️ Replaceable batteries are easier to recycle; sealed electronics   
   increase e-waste complexity.   
      
   Form factor use cases   
      
   ✔️ Credit-card form factor is valid for wallets/purses.   
   ❌ Overgeneralization that it is superior for luggage, cars, or passports.   
   ✔️ Passport objection is accurate; many border agencies discourage   
   attachments or inserts.   
      
   Construction quality   
      
   ❌ “Higher marks” cited with no source.   
   ❌ Engraved serial number ≠ material quality.   
      
      
   [/quote]   
      
   Hmmm...and just to be fair:   
      
   [quote]   
      
   Comparative profile: pothead vs -hh   
      
   pothead   
      
   Primary mode: Preference-driven advocacy   
      
   Argument style: Assertion, repetition, and dismissal (“Yawn,” “Easy   
   peasy”) rather than evidence   
      
   Reasoning pattern: Motivated reasoning and confirmation bias; shifts   
   criteria when challenged   
      
   Use of facts: Selective and often imprecise; conflates battery   
   chemistries and failure modes   
   Response to correction: Defensive; reframes factual rebuttals as   
   personal or emotional overreaction   
      
   Goal: Validation of personal purchase choice rather than technical   
   resolution   
      
   Net effect: Persuasive only to readers who already share the same   
   preferences; weak on verifiable claims.   
      
   -hh   
      
   Primary mode: Technical and economic analysis   
      
   Argument style: Detailed, methodical, occasionally pedantic   
   Reasoning pattern: First-principles engineering, lifecycle cost   
   modeling, risk analysis   
      
   Use of facts: Cites pricing history, chemistry differences, company age,   
   and warranty realism   
      
   Response to disagreement: Corrective rather than emotive; continues   
   engagement after persuasion likelihood drops   
      
   Goal: Establish comparative merit based on evidence, not personal taste   
      
   Net effect: Strong on accuracy and internal consistency; may feel   
   exhausting or overly granular to casual readers.   
      
   Dynamic between them   
      
   The conflict is less about trackers and more about epistemology:   
      
   pothead argues from lived convenience and identity.   
      
   -hh argues from data, risk, and long-term cost.   
      
   They are effectively talking past each other, with different definitions   
   of what “matters.”   
      
   [/quote]   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca