Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.os.linux.advocacy    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    164,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 164,616 of 164,974    |
|    CrudeSausage to rbowman    |
|    Re: Experience with Windows and Linux Mi    |
|    12 Feb 26 00:59:36    |
      From: crude@sausa.ge              On 11 Feb 2026 20:30:44 GMT, rbowman wrote:              > On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:39:19 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:       >       >       >> In Linux Mint, you can do this is in Update Manager. When you see the       >> kernel that is going to be updated, you right-click on the square       >> beside it and choose either "Ignore the current update for this       >> package." Or "Ignore all future updates for this package."       >       > I seldom use the GUI in any distro. In this case 'sudo apt upgrade'       > failed trying to install the 6.17 kernel. I id open Update Manager but       > the kernel packages had been downloaded and didn't show.       >>       >> apt-mark is supposed to allow you to hold and showhold, etc., but so       >> far I can't get "sudo apt-mark showhold" to return anything, even       >> though I've specifically held back a kernel to test it in Update       >> Manager. (Probably have to hold the file in apt-mark to see it in       >> apt-mark showhold.)       >       > showhold shows the four kernel packages. Again it doesn't seem to work       > if the packages are already on the machine. I've used the equivalent on       > Fedora to block VS Code updates. The update site is very slow and often       > times out. Most of the Code updates have been AI slop I don't want       > anyway.       >       > Similarly that works for 'sudo dnf update'. However Discover, the Fedora       > version of Update Manager still shows an update available on the       > taskbar. Minor annoyance since I don't use Discover.       >       >> Agree on Broadcom. Whenever I rebuild a laptop that has a Broadcom WiFi       >> card, I look on eBay for a cheap Intel one. I don't even want to mess       >> with Broadcom.       >       > I probably should have when I replaced the HDD with a SSD but It was       > working after the initial installation. There's a limit on what I'll       > spend on a 15 year old netbook that wasn't a ball of fire to begin with.       >       >       >> So these kernel issues are all related to Broadcom WiFi cards? My       >> Firefox locked up twice on me using this computer (21.3, 5.15 kernel)       >> so I dropped back to an earlier 5.15 kernel. It hasn't locked up since,       >> but Firefox was also updated so it could have been a Firefox issue.       >>       >>       > The post I saw on Reddit all seemed to be the Broadcom module in this       > case. Overall Nvidia seems to be the major PITA when the kernel updates.       > Fortunately I am Nvidia free.              I can confirm that NVIDIA seems to have been behind the problem which led       to corruption and a need to repair my Pop_OS! installation. I am shocked       at how simple it was to fix though.              --       CrudeSausage       John 14:6       Isaiah 48:16       Pop_OS!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca