home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.os.linux.advocacy      Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate      164,974 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 164,616 of 164,974   
   CrudeSausage to rbowman   
   Re: Experience with Windows and Linux Mi   
   12 Feb 26 00:59:36   
   
   From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On 11 Feb 2026 20:30:44 GMT, rbowman wrote:   
      
   > On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:39:19 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >> In Linux Mint, you can do this is in Update Manager. When you see the   
   >> kernel that is going to be updated, you right-click on the square   
   >> beside it and choose either "Ignore the current update for this   
   >> package." Or "Ignore all future updates for this package."   
   >   
   > I seldom use the GUI in any distro. In this case 'sudo apt upgrade'   
   > failed trying to install the 6.17 kernel. I id open Update Manager but   
   > the kernel packages had been downloaded and didn't show.   
   >>   
   >> apt-mark is supposed to allow you to hold and showhold, etc., but so   
   >> far I can't get "sudo apt-mark showhold" to return anything, even   
   >> though I've specifically held back a kernel to test it in Update   
   >> Manager. (Probably have to hold the file in apt-mark to see it in   
   >> apt-mark showhold.)   
   >   
   > showhold shows the four kernel packages. Again it doesn't seem to work   
   > if the packages are already on the machine. I've used the equivalent on   
   > Fedora to block VS Code updates. The update site is very slow and often   
   > times out. Most of the Code updates have been AI slop I don't want   
   > anyway.   
   >   
   > Similarly that works for 'sudo dnf update'. However Discover, the Fedora   
   > version of Update Manager still shows an update available on the   
   > taskbar. Minor annoyance since I don't use Discover.   
   >   
   >> Agree on Broadcom. Whenever I rebuild a laptop that has a Broadcom WiFi   
   >> card, I look on eBay for a cheap Intel one. I don't even want to mess   
   >> with Broadcom.   
   >   
   > I probably should have when I replaced the HDD with a SSD but It was   
   > working after the initial installation. There's a limit on what I'll   
   > spend on a 15 year old netbook that wasn't a ball of fire to begin with.   
   >   
   >   
   >> So these kernel issues are all related to Broadcom WiFi cards? My   
   >> Firefox locked up twice on me using this computer (21.3, 5.15 kernel)   
   >> so I dropped back to an earlier 5.15 kernel. It hasn't locked up since,   
   >> but Firefox was also updated so it could have been a Firefox issue.   
   >>   
   >>   
   > The post I saw on Reddit all seemed to be the Broadcom module in this   
   > case. Overall Nvidia seems to be the major PITA when the kernel updates.   
   > Fortunately I am Nvidia free.   
      
   I can confirm that NVIDIA seems to have been behind the problem which led   
   to corruption and a need to repair my Pop_OS! installation. I am shocked   
   at how simple it was to fix though.   
      
   --   
   CrudeSausage   
   John 14:6   
   Isaiah 48:16   
   Pop_OS!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca