From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 03:29:54 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:   
      
   > On 2026-02-11, CrudeSausage  wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:44:37 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Kind of missed my point. We don't call it "communism" here but what   
   >>> these people want is control way beyond what the Soviet Union was able   
   >>> to achieve.   
   >>   
   >> The point is that no matter what it is called, both parties seem to be   
   >> heading toward their own form of tyranny. I agree. However, Communists   
   >> wants absolute, authoritarian control with severe punishment for anyone   
   >> who calls them out for their idiotic ideas or decisions. For their   
   >> part, the Republicans (or conservatives in general) want absolute   
   >> respect for the rules within their borders and even outside. They want   
   >> to give us the impression that they respect free speech, privacy and   
   >> people's choice of faith even though they want to control speech, limit   
   >> privacy and push a compromised form of Christianity. Nevertheless, I   
   >> would rather have the latter simply because there is still wiggle room,   
   >> and a possibility that whatever freedoms were attacked can be restored.   
   >> With anything the left suggests, not only will your freedoms be   
   >> obliterated, but there is no way they can ever be restored without many   
   >> people dying.   
   >>   
   >> We really are choosing the lesser evil.   
   >   
   > I don't chose lesser evils. I can't speak for the Republicans in   
   > general, but I know the neo-CON Republicans, who run the party (as well   
   > as the neo-CON Democrats) want complete control over every American   
   > citizen. That's a given. (There even openly talking about "scaling down"   
   > the 1st Amendment's freedom of speech.)   
   >   
   > What that piece of shit Trump wants, however, is complete control of the   
   > entire world. And he has no problem using piracy, theft and war to get   
   > it. I also know he's a thrall to the satanic and genocidal Rothschild   
   > cabal so I have zero respect for this bastard.   
   >   
   > Did you see the bimbo Pam Bondi screeching at the Congressional hearing   
   > about the formerly "non-existent" Epstein files? She actually said   
   > (paraphrased) "Why are we talking about (pedophilia by rich pieces of   
   > shit on Epstein Island) because the DOW is over 5,000 points." So, if   
   > the rich are making lots of money, the fact they rape kids' is hunky   
   > dory with this lying bitch. This is the "quality" (so to speak) of   
   > Trump's administration.   
   >   
   > It's worse than pathetic. I'm having trouble believing this is the   
   > lesser of two evils — but it probably is.   
      
   I'll be honest: I have no idea why we're still talking about the Epstein   
   files, but I will readily say that I don't trust anyone who is mentioned   
   in them and shown to be likely guilty. As for how they grilled Bondi, I   
   honestly don't care.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)