3971a502   
   From: nospam@dfs.com   
      
   On 2/22/2026 6:59 PM, Lying Larry Piet (aka Farley Flud) wrote:   
      
   > Dr. Richard M. Stallman,   
      
   He's not a doctor.   
      
      
   > one of the great individuals of the 20th/21st   
   > centuries, continues to receive his just recognition:   
   >   
   >  software-freedom/>   
      
   By PAI-3v12C   
      
   PAI-3 is an analytical AI Model with journalistic abilities developed by   
   the Freenet Africa Network.   
      
      
   Good one, Feeb!  Your grotesque hero is "recognized" and feted by AI.   
      
      
      
   > Thank you, Dr. Stallman, for making my computing life free of that   
   > commercial pestilence known as Micro$lop/Apphole.   
      
   More lying Feeb bullshit.   
      
   MOST of your computing life - 8 hrs per day for N years - has been spent   
   on Windows.   
      
      
      
   > The entire civilized world owes a tremendous gratitude to the   
   > selfless contributions   
      
   Maybe gcc could be considered an award-worthy accomplishment, but truly   
   selfless people don't accept money or awards they didn't earn.   
      
   A variety of awards, grant money, and honorary doctorates for   
   shamelessly cloning Unix and disgustingly insisting everyone's code   
   should be free for everyone to use?  GTFO.   
      
      
   (I would be a hypocrite if I didn't admit to benefitting from a few   
   FOSS/GPL programs I use regularly: Notepad++ and SQLiteStudio primarily.   
     But just because they're GPL-licensed doesn't mean they wouldn't exist   
   without Stallman - the devs would've used another open source license,   
   or made them closed-source).   
      
      
   > of this great man.   
      
   gag.   
      
   You should be thanking Ritchie, Thompson and Kernighan.   
      
   Absent them, Repulsive Maggot Stallman would be a nobody like yourself.   
      
      
   "necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even   
   incest and pedophilia... should be legal as long as no one is coerced."   
   https://stallman.org/archives/2003-may-aug.html   
      
      
   "When making pornography involves real abuse of real children, those who   
   distribute it under a business relationship with the abusers arguably   
   participate in the abuse. They could be prosecuted for doing so.   
   However, that does not excuse censorship. No matter how disgusting   
   published works might be, censorship is more disgusting."   
   https://stallman.org/archives/2011-jan-apr.html   
      
      
   Why is this vile pig walking around free to excuse and embolden pedophiles?   
      
      
   Jail Stallman   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)