XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: robin_listas@es.invalid   
      
   On 2025-12-20 22:42, Paul wrote:   
   > On Sat, 12/20/2025 1:46 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   >> On 2025-12-20 18:14, Paul wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 12/20/2025 7:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
      
      
   >> I agree with you, but some people tell me that the EU sanctioned way is an   
   incinerator.   
   >   
   > The article here, goes into the detail of all the steps to control the   
   output.   
   >   
   >     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incineration   
      
   Long article...   
      
   >   
   > The thing someone was working on here, was some sort of sealed method, so   
   > it didn't involve large volumes of materials moving though a plant. the steps   
   > in the Wikipedia description would require a fairly large building to do the   
   work.   
   > Even the crude incinerator we used to have, which had the fly ash problem,   
   > it was a rather large facility. You couldn't see the incineration part, as   
   > it was up closer to where the crane operator lived. The waste was lifted up   
   > maybe a hundred feet (above grade) and deposited out of eyesight. The pit   
   went   
   > down two hundred feet below grade. (The garbage trucks could dump directly   
   > at the pit edge.) The incinerator had a stack, but the "fallout" from the   
   > tall stack, meant the bit that did not fall right at the   
   > incineration stack... fell at our house.   
   >   
   > I doubt that incinerator, had any of the refinements from the Wikipedia   
   article.   
      
   Here, when they want to incinerate something big, say all the cows in a   
   farm, because they got some infection and they were all killed, is use   
   (rent?) the burners used to make concrete.   
      
   --   
   Cheers, Carlos.   
   ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)